Research on Environmental Protection Clauses in the Investment Field from the Perspective of CPTPP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/vwnjp324Keywords:
CPTPP; Investment Protection; Environmental Protection.Abstract
CPTPP is a typical model in regional integration agreements, and its environmental protection clauses in the investment field reflect the current new concepts of international investment law regarding environmental protection. As China has become the world's largest outward investment economy and the second largest recipient of foreign direct investment, on the one hand, some foreign investment projects have caused damage to China's environment, and on the other hand, China's overseas investments in some countries and regions have also had adverse impacts on the local environment. China has always attached great importance to environmental protection, and in recent years, environmental protection clauses in the investment field have frequently appeared in bilateral investment agreements signed by China. However, there are still many deficiencies in these clauses, which need to be improved by benchmarking against high-standard environmental protection clauses in the investment field. In the context of CPTPP, there are conflicts between environmental protection clauses and investment protection clauses, including the National Treatment Clause, Fair and Equitable Treatment Clause, and Expropriation Clause. From the perspective of CPTPP, the environmental protection clauses in China's investment treaties ignore the setting of balance clauses, the investor protection clauses lack rationality, and exception clauses are absent, requiring China to attach importance to improving environmental protection clauses in investment treaties.
Downloads
References
[1] Sun Chengcheng. "Thoughts on the Judgment Path and Countermeasures of Indirect Expropriation in the Field of International Investment" [J]. Zhejiang Social Sciences, 2020.
[2] Wang Yeqiong. "The Issue of Sustainable Development in International Investment Agreements: From Externality to Endogeneity" [J]. Wuhan University International Law Review, 2021, 5(05): 117-133. DOI: 10.13871/j.cnki.whuilr.2021.05.006.
[3] Liu Yuzi. "From Regulation to Expropriation: The Generative Logic of Regulatory Expropriation—An Investigation Based on American Law" [J]. Journal of Jiaotong Law, 2022(04): 105-121. DOI: 10.19375/j.cnki.31-2075/d.2022.04.009.
[4] Kerner Andrew,Pelc Krzysztof J.Do Investor–State Disputes(Still)Harm FDI?[J]British Journal of Political Science, 2021,52(2)
[5] Noemie Laurens.NAFTA 2.0:The Greenest Trade Agreement Ever? [J]. World Trade Review (2019), 18:4,659-677
[6] Liu Yan. Research on the Principle of the Right to Development and Its Legal Mechanism for Realization in International Investment Agreements [D]. Wuhan University, 2014.
[7] Article 4.2 of the Agreement between the Government of the People's Republic of China and the Government of Canada on the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments.
[8] CPTPP Research Group of the WTO Law Research Association of China Law Society. What Does China Need to Do to Join CPTPP? [J]. Wuhan University International Law Review, 2021, 5(05): 1-26. DOI: 10.13871/j.cnki.whuilr.2021.05.001.
[9] Liu Yunliang, Lu Jin. Research on the Feasibility Basis and Legal Countermeasures for China's Characteristic Free Trade Ports to Align with CPTPP Economic and Trade Rules [J]. Journal of Northwest Minzu University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2022, No.252(06): 52-63. DOI: 10.14084/j.cnki.cn62-1185/c.2022.06.003
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Scientific Journal Of Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.





