Interpretation of the System of Deprivation of Tortious Benefits under Article 1182 of the Civil Code
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/c29p4s89Keywords:
Profit deprivation, Personal rights and interests, Actual loss, Court discretion.Abstract
On the basis of summarizing the Tort Liability Law and practical experience, Article 1182 of the Civil Code adjusts the application order of the system of deprivation of tortious benefits, which is conducive to further depriving tortious benefits to deter tortious acts and provide more adequate protection for victims. However, its scope of application, methods and standards for calculating benefits, and standards for court discretion need to be further clarified. It can be considered to limit the scope of application of profit deprivation to commercializable spiritual personality rights and interests, and identity rights and interests involving the illegal separation of guardians from their wards. When identifying profits, it should be clarified that they can be either an increase in property due to the tort or expenses saved due to the tort. Profits refer to the net profit obtained from the tort and must have a causal relationship with the tortious act. Calculation standards can be divided into comparative standards and constructive license fees or similar market standards according to the type of profit. When exercising discretion, the court should give priority to the tortious benefits, then make a final judgment by comprehensively considering other factors, and clarify the residual status of the court's discretion.
Downloads
References
[1] X.J. Chen: Commentary on Article 1182 of the Civil Code (Compensation for Property Losses Caused by Infringing upon Others' Personal Rights and Interests), China Applied Law, (2023) No. 3, p. 194-214.
[2] Y. Wang, X.D. Zhou: Interpretation and Improvement of the Profit Return System in Article 1182 of the Civil Code, Journal of Guangxi University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), Vol. 43 (2021) No. 2, p. 123-129.
[3] Information on https://www.chinacourt.org
[4] X.B. Zhang: Understanding and Application of the Tort Liability Chapter of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China (China Legal Publishing House, China 2020), p. 76.
[5] X. Cheng: Tort Liability Law (Law Press, China 2015), p. 697.
[6] L.M. Wang: Discussion on Several Issues of Return of Profits from Infringement - Also on Article 959 of the Second Draft of the Civil Code Compilation, Social Sciences in Guangdong, (2019) No. 4, p. 214-224, 256.
[7] D.S. Yang, Y.G. Wang: On the Profit Compensation Rule for Infringing upon Personality Rights from the Perspective of Civil Law Theory, Qinghai Social Sciences, (2024) No. 6, p. 173-184.
[8] Information on http://www.huainan.jcy.gov.cn
[9] R.B. Wang: On Judicial Discretion in the Right to Claim Profit Return - Centered on Article 20 of the Tort Liability Law, Contemporary Law Review, Vol. 31 (2017) No. 4, p. 64-71.
[10] Information on https://www.bafy.gov.cn
[11] J.P. Xi: Unswervingly Follow the Path of Human Rights Development with Chinese Characteristics to Better Promote the Development of China's Human Rights Cause, Contemporary Guangxi, (2022) No. 12, p. 4-6.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Scientific Journal Of Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.





