Ranciere's Discussion on Internal Contradictions of Literature

Authors

  • Han Guan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/dpkzpq05

Keywords:

Aesthetic regime of art; contradiction principle of literature; language-thought; non-discrimination principle; Ranciere.

Abstract

Ranciere's theory of art regime is a completely new paradigm of art criticism, and it conveys the idea that aesthetics and politics themselves are isomorphic. Among the three art regimes, only the aesthetic regime implements the principle of political equality and has a new type of vision that attaches equal importance to thought and image, and it is summarized as the "language-thought" principle and the "non-discrimination" principle, respectively. These two principles present a state of contradiction and struggle in literary works and become the driving force for the development of literature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Jacques Rancière. Mute Speech : Literature, Critical Theory, and Politics. Translated by James Swenson. New York: Columbia University Press,2011: 48.

[2] Jacques Rancière. Mute Speech : Literature, Critical Theory, and Politics. Translated by James Swenson. New York: Columbia University Press,2011: 14.

[3] Jacques Ranciere,“Literature, Politics, Aesthetics: Approaches to Democratic Disagreement," Substance,29, no.2 (2000), 7-8.

[4] Plato. (1997). Phaedrus (A. Nehamas & P. Woodruff, Trans.). In J. M. Cooper (Ed.), Plato: Complete Works (pp. 506–556). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing. (pp. 552–553; 275d–e)

[5] Jacques Rancière. Mute Speech : Literature, Critical Theory, and Politics . Translated by James Swenson. New York: Columbia University Press,2011:75.

[6] Ernst Behler, German Romantic Literary Theory, Li Tangjia, Translated by Mu Lei, Nanjing:Nanjing University Press, 2017,p75.

[7] Jacques Rancière. Aesthetics and Its Discontents[M]. Polity Press.2009:24—25.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Guan, Han. 2025. “Ranciere’s Discussion on Internal Contradictions of Literature”. Scientific Journal Of Humanities and Social Sciences 7 (9): 250-54. https://doi.org/10.54691/dpkzpq05.