Research on Antitrust Issues in the Public Domain
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/c259nk74Keywords:
Public Domain; Administrative Monopoly; Antitrust Enforcement.Abstract
Competition is an indispensable element in the economic development of any nation. While driving forward economic progress, free competition also brings a series of negative consequences such as monopolies. Monopolistic practices in public utilities, cloaked in the guise of public authority, pose particularly grave dangers. Addressing this issue, the report of the 20th CPC National Congress emphasizes that economic development is a critical endeavor directly impacting the people's vital interests, and that antitrust enforcement stands as one of the key legal tools for maintaining stable economic order. Among the diverse domains of antitrust enforcement, the public welfare sector holds the most significant importance and enforcement demands. Research on antitrust regulation in the public sector must be grounded in the pain points of people's livelihoods and guided by practical needs. Building upon an analysis of monopolistic practices in the public sector, it should identify existing challenges and shortcomings in antitrust regulation and formulate regulatory solutions tailored to the unique characteristics of the public sector.
Downloads
References
[1] Zheng Yanxin. Legal Regulation of Abuse of Monopoly Power by Public Utilities in China [M]. Beijing: China Law Press, 2012(9):71-73.
[2] Wang Xiang. Research on Establishing an Antitrust Compliance Governance System for Public Utilities [J]. China Price Regulation and Antitrust, 2024, (03): 40-42.
[3] Xu Shenjian. Conceptual Framework and Legislative Improvement of Administrative Monopoly: An Analysis Based on the Anti-Monopoly Law (Revised Draft) [J]. Administrative Law Research, 2022, (03): 101-113.
[4] Jiang Qi, Wang Yue. How Administrative Monopoly Affects Economic Growth in Shandong [J]. Regional Economy. 2020(3):140-150.
[5] Ruan Heyun. Research on Improving the Administrative Monopoly Regulation System in the Public Services Sector [D]. Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics, 2022.
[6] Zheng Pengcheng. Research on Legal Control of Administrative Monopoly [M]. Beijing: Peking University Press. 2012(9):71-73.
[7] Tang Gan. Research on Antitrust Regulation of Restrictive Trade Practices by Public Utility Franchisees [D]. Southwest University of Political Science and Law, 2020.
[8] Zheng Jieqin. Building Antitrust Compliance Management Systems for Public Utilities: Focusing on Restrictive Trade Practices in Water, Gas, and Power Supply [J]. China Lawyer, 2024, (01): 91-93.
[9] Wang Weiyi. Research on the Compulsory Contract System for Public Utilities in the Civil Code [D]. China University of Political Science and Law, 2020.
[10] Ying Yiyu. Empirical Study on Abuse of Market Dominance by Public Utilities [D]. East China Normal University, 2021.
[11] Yao Yao. Breaking the Administrative Monopoly of Public Utilities: Political, Economic, and Legal Dimensions [J]. Quest, 2016, (07): 24-28.
[12] Sun Jin, Liu Tengyue. Innovations in Local Regulation of Public Utilities Seen Through the Release of the First “Guidance on Antitrust Compliance for Public Utilities” [J]. China Price Regulation and Antitrust, 2022, (08): 14-16.
[13] Qi Duojun. Dilemmas in Legal Regulation of Monopolies in China's Public Utilities: Reflections on Zheng Yanxin's “Legal Regulation of Abuse of Monopoly Power by Public Utilities in China” [J]. Hebei Law Review, 2012, 30 (12): 47-49.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Scientific Journal Of Humanities and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
