Definition of Fake and Substandard Goods in the Crime of Manufacturing or Selling Fake and Substandard Goods

Authors

  • Bing Bai
  • Ruiqi Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/may0mz33

Keywords:

Unity of the Legal Order; Judicial Independence in Criminal Cases; Administrative-Criminal Law Enforcement Nexus; Counterfeit and Substandard Products.

Abstract

The core of the determination of the crime of manufacturing or selling fake and substandard goods lies in the accurate definition of fake and substandard goods. In judicial practice, there are problems such as over-reliance on administrative determination and neglect of independent judgment of criminal illegality, which leads to the situation that administrative determination dominates criminal judgment. By analyzing the relationship between criminal law norms and administrative pre-law, combined with the principle of unity of legal order, this paper puts forward that both the formal standard and the infringement of substantive legal interests should be taken into account in the identification of fake and substandard goods, and the identification standards can be improved by clarifying the scope of legal interests protection, limiting the starting conditions of judicial expertise, and strengthening the rules of linkage between administrative enforcement and criminal justice, so as to realize the dynamic protection of market trading order and consumer rights by criminal law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] M.K. Zhang: Criminal Law (Law Press, China 2016), p.735.

[2] H.B. Chen: Legal Interests and Development of the Crime of Manufacturing or Selling Fake and Substandard Goods, Politics and Law, (2011) No.3, p.43-52.

[3] G.Q. Zhou: The Logic of Judgment in the Case of the Intersection of Criminal and Civilian, China Journal of Criminal Law, (2020) No.3, p.3-20.

[4] L.K. Tu: A Special Arrangement of the Crime of Manufacturing or Selling Fake and Substandard Goods (People's Public Security University China Press, China 2010).

[5] S.Q. Hu: Relative Interpretation of Fake and Substandard Goods in the Crime of Manufacturing or Selling Fake and Substandard Goods, Law Review, 39 (2021), No.2, p.188-196.

[6] Z.X. Wang, J.Q. Xu: Judicial Determination of Fake and Substandard Goods in the Crime of Manufacturing or Selling Fake and Substandard Goods -- Based on the case of Yang and Others Producing and Selling Fake and Substandard Goods, Journal of Shandong Police College, 35(2023), No.1, p.20-29.

[7] Q. Fu. Criminal Judicial Application of Administrative Pre-determination: Dilemma, Misunderstanding and Outlet, Nanjing University Law Review, (2019), No.2, p.261-278.

[8] G.Q. Zhou: Inherent Illegality of Criminal Law, Forum on Politics and Law, 39 (2021), No.5, p.38-53.

[9] Z.X. Zhu: Legal Issues Concerning Mandatory Standards, Quality and Standardization, (2013), No.10, p.1-4.

[10] C.X. Ma: Principle of Unity of Legal Order and Illegal Judgment of Administrative Offenders. Journal of East China University of Political Science and Law, 25(2022), No.2, p.33-45.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-08

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Bai, Bing, and Ruiqi Wang. 2025. “Definition of Fake and Substandard Goods in the Crime of Manufacturing or Selling Fake and Substandard Goods”. Scientific Journal Of Humanities and Social Sciences 7 (12): 406-16. https://doi.org/10.54691/may0mz33.