Jonas's Quest for a Path to Reconcile the Rift between Humans and Nature

Authors

  • Dongdong Zhang
  • Xiaodong Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/rmkeq797

Keywords:

Human and nature; reconcile; life philosophy.

Abstract

The relationship between humans and nature is a timeless topic of human concern. How we understand this issue affects our values and actions, which in turn impact our sustainable development. The dualism of subject and object, introduced by Descartes, triggered a significant movement in the history of thought that highlighted human subjectivity. However, it also created a split between the material and the spiritual, disrupting the harmony between humans and nature. Hans Jonas, a responsible philosopher of the 20th century, critiqued the nihilistic elements of Gnosticism and contemporary existentialism to diagnose the roots of the crisis between humans and nature. He developed a life philosophy that emphasizes life as the highest good, aiming to find a new path that reconciles the rift between humans and nature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Zhang Zhiwei. History of Western Philosophy[M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2010.6.

[2] Zhao Dunhua. A Brief History of Western Philosophy[M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2001.1.

[3] Yu Mouchang. Ecological Philosophy: The Theoretical Foundation of Ecological Civilization[A]. Lu Feng, Cao Mengqin, and Chen Yang. In New Philosophy for the New Era of Ecological Civilization[M]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 2019.4.

[4] Hans Jonas. The Phenomenon of Life-Toward a philosophical Biology/with a foreword by Lawrence Vogel [M]. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2001.

[5] Pascal, Blaise; Translated by Robert. Pensées[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai World Publishing Corporation, 2010.10.

[6] Li Xiying and Hu Tianli. Jonas’s Concept of Life and Its Ethical Implications[J]. Morality and Civilization, 2019.1.

[7] Zhang Rong. Life, Awe, and Responsibility: A Study of Hans Jonas’s Philosophical Thought and Its Effects[M]. Beijing: People’s Publishing House, 2023.3.

[8] Fang Qiuming. A Study of Hans Jonas’s Ethics of Responsibility[D]. Fudan University, Shanghai, 2004.

[9] Hans Jonas. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.

[10] Susanna Lindberg. Hans Jonas’ theory of Life in the Face of Responsibility. Phänomenologische Forschungen, Felix Meiner Verlag GmbH, 2005.

[11] Zhang Qingxiong. Dao, Life, and Responsibility[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2009.9.

[12] Angela Michelis. Identity, Freedom and Relationships of Responsibility in Hans Jonas’ philosophy, Problemata-Rev.Int. De Filosofia, Vol. 4, No.1, 2013.

[13] Hans Jonas. Mortality and Morality: Toward a Philosophical Biology [M]. edited and introduced by Lawrence Vogel. Evanson: Northwestern University Press. 1996.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-17

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhang, Dongdong, and Xiaodong Wang. 2026. “Jonas’s Quest for a Path to Reconcile the Rift Between Humans and Nature”. Scientific Journal Of Humanities and Social Sciences 8 (4): 256-70. https://doi.org/10.54691/rmkeq797.