The Shackles of “Things” and the Prison of Class: A Material Semiotic Interpretation of Marriage Transactions in Vanity Fair

Authors

  • Qingxuan Ren

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/08s2vy44

Keywords:

Vanity Fair; material semiotics; marital transactions; class barriers; women’s fate.

Abstract

William Makepeace Thackeray’s Vanity Fair is set in the Victorian era and vividly portrays a society obsessed with material desires. This article takes the perspective of material semiotics, selecting key material objects such as dowries and jewelry in the novel’s marriage transaction scenes for analysis, aiming to explore the class implications these material symbols carry and the hidden power struggles behind them. The study shows that these material symbols are not only indispensable bargaining chips in marriage transactions but also become class barriers and invisible shackles. The female characters in the novel make markedly different choices in this marriage game mediated by material wealth, yet their fates ultimately converge, as none manage to break free from these shackles, becoming victims of the class prison. So, this article attempts to uncover the hypocritical veil of the Victorian marriage system by interpreting the symbolic meanings of these material objects, thereby revealing the real survival difficulties and struggles of women at that time under the dual pressures of materialism and class.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Armstrong, N. (2012). Desire and domestic fiction: A political history of the novel. Oxford University Press.

[2] Barthes, R. (2013). Mythologies. Hill and Wang.

[3] Butler, J. (2019). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.

[4] Eagleton, T. (2018). Literary theory: An introduction. University of Minnesota Press

[5] Hobsbawm, E. (2017). The age of capital 1848–1875. Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

[6] Miller, D. (2010). Material culture and mass consumption. Blackwell Publishers.

[7] Moretti, F. (2013). Graphs, maps, trees: Abstract models for a literary history. Verso.

[8] Poovey, M. (2014). Uneven developments: The ideological work of gender in mid-Victorian England. University of Chicago Press.

[9] Thackeray, W. M. (2018). Vanity fair. Oxford University Press.

[10] Williams, R. (2015). Culture and society 1780–1950. Penguin Books

Downloads

Published

2026-06-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ren, Qingxuan. 2026. “The Shackles of ‘Things’ and the Prison of Class: A Material Semiotic Interpretation of Marriage Transactions in Vanity Fair”. Scientific Journal Of Humanities and Social Sciences 8 (4): 383-90. https://doi.org/10.54691/08s2vy44.