The Impact of Value-added Tax on Private School Tuition Fees on Socio-economic Mobility in the UK

Authors

  • Yuxin Jin Cardiff sixth form college, Cardiff, CF24 0AA, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/3ak3h202

Keywords:

Value-added Tax; redistribution of educational resources; educational inequality.

Abstract

This article focuses on the UK government's plan to impose a 20% value-added tax on private school tuition fees in January 2025. It systematically explores its potential impact on socio-economic mobility. The research background indicates that public schools in the UK undertake 94% of the educational functions but are constrained by resource scarcity due to financial limitations, while private schools have long enjoyed value-added tax exemptions, resulting in an imbalance in the allocation of educational resources and exacerbating the lack of social and economic mobility. Research suggests that if this policy can allocate 1.5-2 billion pounds of annual tax revenue towards public schools, it can alleviate unequal distribution of educational resources, provide more equal development opportunities for vulnerable groups, and promote socio-economic mobility by improving infrastructure, expanding teacher and curriculum systems (such as adding AI courses). In response to the controversies that policies may cause, such as intensified education stratification, doubts about the efficiency of fund utilization, and resource squeezing in public schools, research suggests that transparent and fair resource allocation mechanisms can alleviate these issues. In addition, although factors such as differences in inherited wealth and insufficient education awareness among low-income groups constitute additional constraints on social mobility, the core effect of policies still depends on the investment and efficiency of tax funds. Proper implementation will promote social equity, while the opposite may solidify educational inequality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Barrington, K. (2022, May 27). Tips for transferring your student from private to public school. Public School Review. https://www.publicschoolreview.com/blog/tips-for-transferring-your-student-from-private-to-public-school.

[2] Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2004). How to improve the supply of high quality teachers. Brookings Papers on Education Policy, 2004, 7 25. https://doi.org/10.1353/pep.2004.0001

[3] Tahir, I. (2022, August 18). The UK education system preserves inequality – new report. The Conversation.

[4] Information on: https://ifs.org.uk/articles/uk-education-system-preserves-inequality-new-report

[5] Keddie, A. (2019). Educational inequality and access to higher education: A UK perspective. Educational Studies, 45(3), 301 317. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1549544

[6] Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty first century (A. Goldhammer, Trans.). Harvard University Press.

[7] Social Mobility Commission. (2022, June 23). State of the Nation 2022: A fresh approach to social mobility. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/state of the nation 2022 a fresh approach to social mobility

[8] Sullivan, A. (2014). Social class and educational aspiration: The role of education in social reproduction. Educational Research, 56(1), 64 80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2014.889479

[9] Tamborini, C. R., Kim, C. H., & Sakamoto, A. (2015). Education and lifetime earnings in the United States. Demography, 52(4), 1383 1407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524 015 0407 0

[10] Well Rounded Education. (2025, June 29). Breaking down barriers to higher education access for disadvantaged individuals. https://www.wellroundededucation.com/breaking down barriers to higher education access for disadvantaged individuals

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Jin, Yuxin. 2026. “The Impact of Value-Added Tax on Private School Tuition Fees on Socio-Economic Mobility in the UK”. Scientific Journal Of Humanities and Social Sciences 8 (9): 112-20. https://doi.org/10.54691/3ak3h202.