Practical Dilemmas and Countermeasures for Rural Township “Red‑and‑White Events” Custom Transformation: A Case Study of Litian Village, Guangxi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/sd1b2x44Keywords:
Transforming social customs, Red and white events (weddings and funerals),Rural governance.Abstract
Against the backdrop of rural revitalization, transforming outdated social customs is an important lever for building rural civility and strengthening rural governance. In some rural areas, outdated practices such as lavish ceremonies, exorbitant bride prices, reciprocal comparison, and neglected care for the elderly accompanied by lavish funerals persist, increasing farmers’ burdens and constraining rural cultural revitalization. Taking Litian Village, a Yao village in Gongcheng, Guangxi, as a case study, and drawing on rural construction theory and collaborative governance theory, this paper examines the practical measures and outcomes of transforming social customs surrounding red and white events (weddings and funerals). The study finds that the village promotes rural custom governance through a “Red and White Council + grid-based management” model, the “Five Unifications” system, a village-level civilization hall, and the revitalization of the Yao “liangbian zou” (walking both ways) marital custom. Nevertheless, problems remain, including insufficiently deep publicity, villagers’ wait-and-see attitudes, blind spots in supervision, and inadequate multi-actor coordination. These problems are rooted in the constraints of local face culture, the limited binding force of village covenants, and the lack of positive incentives and linkage mechanisms. Accordingly, countermeasures are proposed from the perspectives of precision governance, model-based guidance, public service improvement, and the construction of a multi-actor co-governance pattern, so as to provide practical reference for ethnic minority townships seeking to deepen the transformation of social customs.
Downloads
References
[1] Xi, J. P. (2022). Hold high the great banner of socialism with Chinese characteristics and strive in unity to build a modern socialist country in all-respects: Report at the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China. People’s Publishing House.
[2] CPC Central Committee, & State Council. (2023, February 13). Opinions on doing a good job in the key work of promoting rural vitalization in 2023 [Online].
[3] CPC Central Committee, & State Council. (2024, February 3). Opinions on effectively promoting comprehensive rural vitalization by learning and applying the experience of the “thousand-village demonstration and ten-thousand-village renovation” project [Online].
[4] Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress. (2021). Rural vitalization promotion law of the People’s Republic of China.
[5] Rogers, E. M. (1988). Rural social change. Zhejiang People’s Publishing House.
[6] Du, Z. Q. (Duara, P.). (1994). Culture, power, and the state: Rural North China, 1900–1942. Jiangsu People’s Publishing House.
[7] Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
[8] Zhong, J. W. (1992). An introduction to folklore. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Sciences), (5), 1–13.
[9] Zhang, B. (2015). Customs and governance: The ancient Chinese thought of reforming social customs. Journal of Guangxi University for Nationalities (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 38(5), 98–107.
[10] Guo, Z. L. (2004). Rural governance and its institutional performance evaluation. Journal of Central China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 50(4), 24–32.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Scientific Journal Of Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.





