Maize Seedling and Weed Detection Using BFSL-YOLOv8
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6911/WSRJ.202503_11(3).0004Keywords:
Maize, Weed Detection, YOLOv8, BiFormer, SPPF, LSKA.Abstract
Addressing the urgent need for weed control in maize seedlings due to the low detection accuracy in complex agricultural environments, this paper proposes a BFSL-YOLOv8 model. paper proposes a BFSL-YOLOv8 model. The model enhances multi-scale feature extraction and fusion by integrating a Spatial Pyramid Pooling with Large Separable Kernel Attention and skip connections (SPPF_LSKA) module into the neck of YOLOv8 and efficiently captures long-range dependencies by introducing an improved BiFormer module in the head. Experiments were conducted on a publicly available real-world field monitoring dataset under Experiments were conducted on a publicly available real-world field monitoring dataset under specific hardware and software environments, using stochastic gradient descent (SGD) for training. achieves a mean Average Precision (mAP) of 99.5% for maize detection and improves the mAP at an Intersection over Union (IoU) threshold of 0.5 (mAP50) for weed detection by 0.5 percentage points to 64.8% compared to the baseline YOLOv8. The model has 3.70M parameters and a processing time of 4.4ms per image. F1-confidence curve analysis indicates that BFSL-YOLOv8 exhibits good robustness in complex scenarios, with an optimal confidence threshold of 0.292 and an average confidence threshold of 1.5 times. of 0.292 and an average F1-score of 0.82 for all classes. The experiments validate the effectiveness of the proposed method, providing a new solution for accurate and efficient weed detection in maize. accurate and efficient weed detection in maize fields for precision agriculture.
Downloads
References
[1] Li Shaopeng, et al. Progress of research on weed damage and comprehensive prevention and control technology in corn fields [J]. Corn Science, 2020, 28(4): 188-194.
[2] KNEZEVICH S R, HORAK M J, PATRICK K A. Corn (Zea mays L.) yield loss assessments from common sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) [J]. Weed Science, 1997, 45(2): 202-207.
[3] WILSON R G, WESTERMAN P W. Weed thresholds for postemergence herbicide applications in corn (Zea mays) [J]. Weed Technology, 1991, 5(2): 392-398.
[4] HEAP I. Global perspective of herbicide-resistant weeds [J]. Pest Management Science, 2014, 70(9): 1306-1315.
[5] SILVA V, et al. Pesticide fate and transport in agricultural soils: an overview [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 612: 1322-1335.
[6] W. B. Wu, et al. Research progress on the effects of herbicides on soil environment [J]. Journal of Agricultural Environmental Science, 2019, 38(1): 1-10.
[7] FENNIMORE S A, et al. Environmental impacts of pesticides used in agriculture [J]. Advances in Agronomy, 2018, 150: 1-60.
[8] MOSTAFALOU S, ABDOLLAHI M. Pesticides and human chronic diseases: evidence-based toxicology [J]. Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 2017, 317: 1-12.
[9] KAMILARIS A, PRENAFETA-BOLDÚ F. Deep learning in agriculture: a survey [J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2018, 147: 70-90.
[10] Can Wang, Xinhui Wu, Zhiwei Li. Multi-scale hierarchical feature extraction based on convolutional neural network to recognize corn weeds[J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(5): 144-151.
[11] FAN Xiangpeng, ZHOU Jianping, XU Yan, et al. Optimized Faster R-CNN-based weed identification and localization in cotton seedling stage[J]. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 2021, 52(5): 26-34.
[12] Zhang Le, Jin Xiu, Fu Leiyang, et al. A weed identification method for oilseed rape field based on Faster R-CNN deep network[J]. Advances in Lasers and Optoelectronics, 2020, 57(2): 304-312.
[13] Jie Xu, Gang Liu, Guo Guofa. Weed detection method based on multi-scale fusion module and feature enhancement[J]. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 2022, 53(4): 254-260.
[14] [14]PENG S, KEYI C, LONGFU Z, et al. An improved cascade R-CNN and RGB-D camera-based method for dynamic cotton top bud recognition and localization in the field[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2022, 202.
[15] YU J, SCHUMANN W A, SHARPE M S, et al. Detection of grassy weeds in bermudagrass with deep convolutional neural networks[J]. Weed Science, 2020, 68(5): 1-31.
[16] J. Sun, W. Tan, S. Wu, et al. Multi-channel depth-separable convolutional modeling for real-time recognition of sugar beet and weeds in complex background[J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2019, 35(12): 184-190.
[17] MENG Qingkuan, ZHANG Man, YANG Xiaoxia, et al. Corn seedling and weed recognition based on lightweight convolution combined with feature information fusion[J]. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 2020, 51(12): 238-245.
[18] WANG C Y, BOCHKOVSKIY A, LIAO H. Scaled-YOLOv4: Scaling cross stage partial network[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2021: 13029-13038.
[19] YANG Yuqing. Research and application of peanut seedling stage weed identification based on YOLOv4-Tiny-CBAM [D]. Anhui Agricultural University, 2022. (DOI information is usually not placed in the references, and dissertations need to include the name of the school)
[20] JI Wenli, LIU Zhou, XING Haihua. A lightweight method for weed identification in farmland based on YOLO v5[J]. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 2024, 55(1): 212-222.
[21] Ultralytics.yolov5[EB/OL].https://github.com/ultralytics/yolov5 , 2024-10-26.
[22] HE J, ZHANG S, YANG C, et al. Pest recognition in microstate state: an improvement of YOLOv7 based on Spatial and Channel Reconstruction Convolution for feature redundancy and vision transformer with Bi-Level Routing Attention[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2024, 15: 1327237.
[23] WAI K L, LAI-MAN P, UR A Y R. Large Separable Kernel Attention: Rethinking the Large Kernel Attention design in CNN[J]. Expert Systems With Applications, 2024, 236.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 World Scientific Research Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.



