Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Internationalization of China and USA from the Perspective of Policy Impacts

A Mini Review

Authors

  • Fanzheng Gan
  • Peng Xiao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpep.v3i.39

Keywords:

Higher Education Internationalization; Education Policy; Policy Impacts; Life-cycle Theory.

Abstract

With the globalization development, the competition of higher education internationalization is intensifying in major countries with numbers of policies and changes emerge one after another. In order to explore the role of policies in the development of internationalization of higher education, this paper combines systematic policy-related documents review and case study to make a comparative analysis of the development process as well as the policies of internationalization of higher education in between China and the United States. It sorts out that the general development strategies which including policies for attracting overseas students, study abroad on public assignment, exchange projects of teachers and scientific researchers and the development of joint higher education programs. It also points out that the internationalization of higher education has become an important means of public and cultural diplomacy of large countries and an important way for countries to explode cultural exchanges, enhance the comprehensive strength of the country and continuously improve on its’ national level strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

David, P. (2001). Path Dependence, Its Critics and the Quest for ‘Historical Economics’. In Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas: Past and Present, 15, 40.

Giulianotti, R., & Robertson, R. (2006). Globalization, globalization and migration: The case of Scottish football supporters in North America. International Sociology, 21(2), 171-198.

Hong, M. (2020). A comparative study of the internationalization of higher education policy in Australia and China (2008–2015). Studies in Higher Education, 45(4), 768-779.

Hammond, C. D. (2016). Internationalization, nationalism, and global competitiveness: a comparison of approaches to higher education in China and Japan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(4), 555-566. https: //link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12564-016-9459-0.

Huang, F. (2006). Internationalization of curricula in higher education institutions in comparative perspectives: Case studies of China, Japan and the Netherlands. Higher Education, 51(4), 521-539.

Jessop, B. (2016). Putting higher education in its place in (East Asian) political economy. Comparative education, 52(1), 8-25.

Kim, T. (2009) “Confucianism, Modernism and Knowledge: China, South Korea and Japan (Chapter 55).” In International Handbook of Comparative Education, edited by R. Cowen, and A. Kazamias, 857–872. Dordrecht: Springer.

Lee, J., Liu, K., & Wu, Y. (2020). Does the Asian catch-up model of world-class universities work? Revisiting the zero-sum game of global university rankings and government policies. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 1-25.

Lianming, Li. The adjustment of American higher education internationalization policy and its impact after the 9/11 [J]. Global education outlook, 2009, (10).

Palmer, J. D., & Cho, Y. H. (2012). South Korean higher education internationalization policies: Perceptions and experiences. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13(3), 387-401.

Peters, M. A. (2020). China’s belt and road initiative: Reshaping global higher education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52 (6), 586-592.

Sanders, I. T. & Ward, J. G. Bridges to Understanding: International Programs of American College and Universities[M]. New York: Megraw-Hill Book Company,1970.135.

Tight, M. (2019). Globalization and internationalization as frameworks for higher education research. Research Papers in Education, 1-23.

The Institute of International Education. The Open Doors 2019 Report on International Educational Exchange [R]. New York: The Institute of International Education, 2019.

Thompson, M. R. (1996). Late industrialisers, late democratisers: developmental states in the Asia-Pacific. Third World Quarterly, 17(4), 625-648.

UNESCO (1998) World Conference on Higher Education. “Higher Education in the 21st century, Vision and Action”, Vol. I Final Report. UNESCO, Paris, 5-9 October 1998. Retrieved 19 August 2020 from: http:// unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0011/001163/116345e.pdf.

Vogel, E. F. (2013). Japan as number one: Lessons for America. Harvard University Press.

Wihlborg, M., & Robson, S. (2018). Internationalization of higher education: Drivers, rationales, priorities, values and impacts. European journal of higher education, 8(1), 8-18.

Zengfu Yu, Jiang Bo, Xiaoyu Zhu. History of international exchanges and cooperation in Education [M]. Haikou: Hainan Publishing House, 2001:79,40,20-22118-120,19,75-77.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-02

How to Cite

Gan, F., & Xiao, P. (2021). Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Internationalization of China and USA from the Perspective of Policy Impacts: A Mini Review. BCP Education & Psychology, 3, 206-212. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpep.v3i.39