Framing Effect in Medical Decision Making

Authors

  • Tianshan Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpep.v9i.4605

Keywords:

Framing Effect; Medical Decision Making; Prospect Theory; Health State Utility.

Abstract

In the century that the medical system is becoming more and more mature, there are more options interfering patients’ eyes. Framing effect, known to be effective in one’s decision-making process, can lead patients to certain options, misunderstandings and subsequent arbitrary decisions may take place. Therefore, in this study, four main factors, or effects, are discussed based on framing effect. People behave preferences according to words they hear. This ‘words’ include descriptive adjectives attached to one event or object, numerical descriptions like survival probability and whether it is described as an uncertainty or a risk. As a result of loss aversion, a negative description will lead to risk-taking behaviours, while a positive description will lead to risk aversion ones. At the same time, if the given probability level is considerably low, patients will turn to risk aversion and choose conservative treatments, weighing life quality more than quantity. Aside from numeric, people show consistent disbelief upon uncertainty to certain risk no matter the real probability level and will set a subjective probability for uncertain choices. Health state utility can also be another indicator when judging the patients’ state because of the prospect theory. In conclusion, people with different health states put different anticipation on medical results. Ages and prior disease experience are the two main factors influencing the patients’ own measurement of their health state utilities. The older the patients are, the more utility they will assign to. Those who have historical disease assign more utility than those who do not.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory, an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 264-291.

Savage, L.J. (1954) The Foundations of Statistics (Wiley, New York).

Allais, M. (1979). The Foundations of a Positive Theory of Choice Involving Risk and a Criticism of the Postulates and Axioms of the American School (1952). In: Allais, M., Hagen, O. (eds) Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. Theory and Decision Library, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht.

Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4), 643–669.

Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211,453-458.

O'Connor, A.M. (1989). Effects of framing and level of probability on patients' preferences for cancer chemotherapy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology; J Clin Epidemiol, 42(2), 119-126.

Levin, I.P., Schneider, S.L., et al. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effect. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 76 (2), 149-188.

Treadwell, J.R., Lenert, L.A. (1999). Health Values and Prospect Theory. Medical Decision Making. 19(3), 344-352.

Xu, J., Sun, X., et al. (2019). Analysis of the factors influencing the clinical decision of the family members of patients with terminal cancers. Chinese nursing research September 33 (18), 3192-3197.

Sackett, D.L., Torrance, G.W. (1978) The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public. Journal of chronic diseases 31 (11), 697-704.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-29

How to Cite

Li, T. (2023). Framing Effect in Medical Decision Making. BCP Education & Psychology, 9, 33-38. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpep.v9i.4605