The Three-party Evolutionary Game Under "Re-familization" Family Policies

Authors

  • Shutong Qian

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpep.v9i.4694

Keywords:

Re-familization, Fertility Choice, Family Policy; Evolutionary Game Theory.

Abstract

With the development of society and the change of fertility culture, the fertility rate is gradually decreasing around the world, which leads to a lot of problems, so the Chinese government is seeking effective family policies to improve fertility levels. Based on the evolutionary game theory, the article defines the three participants in the evolutionary process of fertility choice and their payoff functions, then constructs a three-party evolutionary game model among individuals, firms and local governments, and finally analyzes the strategic choices of each party under the government-led family policies. The findings suggest that economic policies that directly give cash incentives and tax benefits are more effective in increasing fertility rate and creating a fertility-friendly social environment. Thus, the author suggests that the government should mainly use economic policies to promote the increase of fertility level and solve the social problem of low fertility rate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Birdsall, N., Jamison, D. T.: Income and other factors influencing fertility in China. Population and Development Review, 651-675 (1983).

Hotz, V. J., Miller, R. A.: An empirical analysis of life cycle fertility and female labor supply. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 91-118 (1988).

Tao, Y., Marjorie, M., Zheng, S.: The impact of China’s population policy on fertility. Chinese Journal of Population Science 2000(03), 18-22 (2000).

Wei, C.: China’s low fertility rate and the three-child policy: Analysis based on the data of the seventh national census. Population & Economics 2021(05), 25-35 (2021).

Morgan, S. P., Guo Z. G., Hayford, S. R.: China's below‐replacement fertility: Recent trends and future prospects. Population and development review 35(3), 605-629 (2009).

He, Y.L., Lin, Y., Zhang, L.Y.: The effect of public education investment and social security on fertility rate and education level. Nankai Economic Studies 2016(03), 133-153 (2016).

Wang, T.Y., Peng X.B.: The impact of social security on fertility desire: Evidence from new rural cooperative medical scheme. Economic Research Journal 50(02), 103-117 (2015).

Zhang, A.T., Du, Y.P.: The non-political factors’ effect on the fertility rate in China. Population Journal 2006(02), 3-7 (2006).

Yang, H., Zheng, X., Zhou, R., Shen, Z., Huang, X.: Fertility behavior and depression among women: evidence From China. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 565508 (2020).

Shen, Z., Yang, J.: A Simulation Study of the Effect of Delayed Retirement on Welfare of the Elderly: Evidence from China. SAGE Open, 11(2), 21582440211016901 (2021).

Mu, Y., Yuan, X.: Having the second child: Family resources, cultural values or child gender? Population Research 42(01), 90-103 (2018).

Freedman, D. S., Thornton, A.: Income and fertility: The elusive relationship. Demography 19, 65-78(1982).

Poston Jr, D. L., Gu, B.: Socioeconomic development, family planning, and fertility in China. Demography 531-551 (1987).

Akagawa, M.: A natural history model of low birth rate issues in Japan since the 1990s. The American Sociologist 50(2), 300-314(2019).

Peter, M.: Very Low Fertility: Consequences, Causes and Policy Approaches. Japanese Journal of Population 2008(6), 19-23 (2008).

Pan, L., Xu J. G.: Housing price and fertility rate. China economic journal 5, 2-3,97-111 (2012).

Abbasi, M. J., Mehryar, A., Jones, G., McDonald, P.: Revolution, war and modernization: Population policy and fertility change in Iran. Journal of population research 19(1), 25-46 (2002).

Demeny, P.: Social science and population policy. The Population and Development Review, 451-479 (1988).

Gurunath, S., Pandian, Z., Anderson, R. A., Bhattacharya, S.: Defining infertility—a systematic review of prevalence studies. Human reproduction update 17(5), 575-588 (2011).

Bongaarts, J., Watkins, S. C.: Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions. Population and development review, 639-682 (1996).

Xia, Z, Q., Yang, Z, P.: The fairness of cost sharing in fertility: Based on the non-balanced state of cost and benefit. Population and Development 25(01), 47-57 (2019).

Narayan, P. K., Peng, X.: An econometric analysis of the determinants of fertility for China, 1952–2000. Journal of Chinese economic and business studies, 4(2), 165-183 (2006).

Minja, K., Hyungseok, K.: Lowest-low fertility in South Korea: Variations by locality. Chinese Journal of Population Science 2014(02), 44-54+126-127(2014).

Yi, Y.Y., Liu, H, M.: Evolutionary game theory in economic research. Journal of Business Economics 2005(08), 8-13 (2005).

Kainan, H.: Evolutionary games and evolutionary economics. Economic Research Journal 44(02), 132-145(2009).

Downloads

Published

2023-03-29

How to Cite

Qian, S. (2023). The Three-party Evolutionary Game Under "Re-familization" Family Policies. BCP Education & Psychology, 9, 262-272. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpep.v9i.4694