Implement the Temporary Protection System of Invention Patents

-- From the Perspective of the Payment Mechanism of Patent Royalty

Authors

  • Haolan Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpep.v10i.5399

Keywords:

Temporary Protection System; Patent Royalty; Patent Applicant.

Abstract

The existing temporary protection system seems to protect patent applicants through patent royalties. In fact, due to its emphasis on technology dissemination, pursuit of judicial efficiency, and lack of judicial relief for cost recovery during the temporary protection duration, the temporary protection system is ineffective. The abnormal protection mode that holds “double protection is given when a patent is authorized and no protection is given when a patent is not authorized” provides a larger room for a “submarine patent”. Concerning the behavior of “implementing related inventions in the temporary protection duration”, on the one hand, the law seldom endows patent applicants with rights; on the other hand, certain concessions must be made based on the awareness of rights, which leads to “patent royalty” that is hard to dispose of for personnel handling the case. To implement the temporary protection system of invention patents, it is necessary to combine the unique patent examination system in China. “Whether authorized or not, the patent royalty should be paid” is the original principle of “temporary protection” in China. As an independent stage, the patent royalties during the temporary protection duration should be premised on the patent license fee/infringement fee. Besides, special standards of calculation and examination as well as implementation plans should be established.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wang, Q. (2007). A Course in Intellectual Property Law. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 314.

Yang, M. (2013). On the temporary protection system of invention patent from the guiding case No.20 of the Supreme People’s Court. Beijing Arbitration Quarterly, (04), 41-56.

Sun, Z. G. (2012). Research about elusion countermeasure of submarine patent strategy. Science and Technology Management Research, 32(09), 167-170.

Wu, M. Y. & Ye, R. (2019). The enlightenment of enterprise practice under the current system of provisional protection of invention patents--The analysis of guidance of case No. 20 of supreme law. Journal of Hebei Youth Administrative Cadres College, 31(04), 66-69.

Cui, Y. Q. (2018). On the systematic explanation of invention patent infringement during temporary protection period. Legal Method, 25(03), 453-465.

An, X. M. & Zhu, X. Z. (2007). On the claim of temporary protection. Presentday Law Science, (03), 3-10.

Wang, G. Z. (2022). Special jurisprudence of the way of bearing the liability for infringement of intellectual property rights. Science of Law (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law), 40(04), 114-125.

Liu, M. J. (2019). On temporary protection in China’s patent law. Henan Technology and Science, (33), 22-24.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-16

How to Cite

Li, H. (2023). Implement the Temporary Protection System of Invention Patents: -- From the Perspective of the Payment Mechanism of Patent Royalty. BCP Education & Psychology, 10, 309-317. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpep.v10i.5399