Research on Legal Regulation of Stakeholders under the Background of “Double Reduction” Policy

Authors

  • Zhenyan Zhu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpep.v10i.5406

Keywords:

“Double Reduction”; Rights; Supervision; Legalization.

Abstract

The “double reduction” policy provides strong enlightenment for educational reform and an effective guarantee for a good educational ecological environment. However, related policies will inevitably encounter challenges and difficulties in their implementation, such as unclear limits of individual rights, vague boundaries of government supervision, and insufficient ways to relieve infringement. Due to the lack of legal regulation, the policy can not completely adjust the social relations of related subjects. Therefore, in addition to strengthening the legal guarantee of the “double reduction” policy, we should clarify the limits of individual education rights and the boundaries of government public power, so as to fully synergize family education, school education, and off-campus education, and ensure the relations and corresponding legal responsibilities of each subject.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China: The General Office of the CPC Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council issued the Opinions on Further Reducing the Burden of Excessive Homework and Off-campus Tutoring for Students Undergoing Compulsory Education [EB/OL]. 2021 [7-24]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb _ xxgk/moe _ 1777/moe _ 1778/ 2021 07/ t 2021 0724 _ 546576. html. April 20, 2022.

Meng, Z. W. “Double reduction” policy is intended to be clearly incorporated into the law to avoid increasing the burden on students in compulsory education. [EB/OL]. 2021[10-18]. https://ie--bjd--com--cn--93c36a8pd.3pco. ourwebpicvip. com/ 5b165687 a010550e 5ddc0e6a/ contentApp/ 5b16573ae4b 02a9fe2d558f9/AP616d5a14e4b08aed9d8fc8ed?isshare=1&app=60d02babe4b00540960734bf&contentType=0&isBjh=0. May, 1, 2022.

Zhu, J. (2022). Legislative supervision of off-campus education and training. Journal of Education Science of Hunan Normal University, 21(05), 12-22.

Zhang, Q. B. & Cao, Y. Re-regulation of the self-regulation of education system: Procedural rule of law in “double reduction” policy from the perspective of social theory. New Liberal Arts Education Research, (01), 75-92+143.

Yu, H. (2021). Rebuilding publicity of fundamental education in the era of “double reduction” and concerns of equity. Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences, (12), 145-153+170.

Luo, S. Q. & Zhang, Y. (2022). “Double reduction” and “double enhancement”: The logic conversion and concept reconstruction of teaching reform. Modern Distance Education Research, 34(02), 3-10+20.

Shen, S. P. (2021). Education legislation and the systematic guarantee for the right to education. Educational Research, 42(08), 35-47.

Beijing News: Pi Jianlong, member of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference: The “double reduction” policy needs to improve the legal guarantee” [EB/OL]. 2022 [3-02]. https://www.bjnews.com.cn/detail/164620434714914. html. April 21, 2022.

Du, X. (2022). The difficulties of after-class service under the vision of “double reduction” policy and its solution. Jinan Journal (Philosophy & Social Sciences), 44(03), 121-132.

Shen, S. P. (2021). Education legislation and the systematic guarantee for the right to education. Educational Research, 42(08), 35-47.

Luo, S. Q. & Zhang, Y. (2022). “Double reduction” and “double enhancement”: The logic conversion and concept reconstruction of teaching reform. Modern Distance Education Research, 34(02), 3-10+20.

Deng, J. Q. (2021). The constitutional logic of family education promotion law. Journal of Soochow University (Educational Science Edition), 9(04), 64-71.

Shen, S. P. (2021). Education legislation and the systematic guarantee for the right to education. Educational Research, 42(08), 35-47.

Chen, Y. T. (2022). Double reduction policy and development of rural compulsory education in the new era: Policy logic, realistic influence and innovative strategies. Journal of Yibin University, 22(03), 65-76.

Tan, J. C. (2022). The functional system and the path to codification of the right to education. New Liberal Arts Education Research, (01), 59-74+142-143.

Zhang, Q. & Zhong, Y. Y. (2019). Educational liberty and its limitation: A review of the thought of educational liberty of Tocqueville. Journal of Educational Studies, 15(06), 18-24.

Notice of the General Office of the Ministry of Education on the Enrollment of Compulsory Education in 2017. Gazette of the Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China, 2017-02-22.

Zhang, Z. Y. (2021). Reconstruction and governance of public education system under the pattern of “easing the burden of excessive homework and off-campus tutoring for students undergoing compulsory education”. Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, (09), 20-26+49.

Qi, Z. Y., Yu, Y. Y., Du, Y. & Wang, S. Q. (2021). On the supply subject and behavior choice of the family education guidance service support system. Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, (06), 33-38.

Zhu, J. (2022). Legislative supervision of off-campus education and training. Journal of Education Science of Hunan Normal University, 21(05), 12-22.

Wu, Z. M., Chen, X. Y. & Meng, F. X. (2022). Thoughts on the legislation on out-of-school training in China—Based on the implementation of the “double reduction” policy and the governance of the out-of-school training. Modern Distance Education Research, 34(05), 20-26+36.

Yu, H. (2021). Rebuilding publicity of fundamental education in the era of “double reduction” and concerns of equity. Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences, (12), 145-153+170.

Luo, S. Q. & Zhang, Y. (2022). “Double reduction” and “double enhancement”: The logic conversion and concept reconstruction of teaching reform. Modern Distance Education Research, 34(02), 3-10+20.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-16

How to Cite

Zhu, Z. (2023). Research on Legal Regulation of Stakeholders under the Background of “Double Reduction” Policy. BCP Education & Psychology, 10, 355-362. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpep.v10i.5406