Comparative Analysis of Animation Education (AE) in Colleges and Universities in Korea

Abstract

With the development trend of globalization of cultural industry, the Korean government put forward the goal of rejuvenating the country with "cultural prosperity", and opened up a wide range of elite talents and cultural ideas. It is precisely because of this open ideological and educational environment that South Korea has accelerated the development and dissemination of its national cultural industry，Korean animation industry has also been effectively helped and supported in this era. However, looking at the current situation of China's animation industry, the domestic original animation market is depressed, the creative ability and production level of employees are general, the contradiction between the lack of high-quality professionals in the market and the red light of animation employment in Colleges and universities is becoming more and more serious. Based on the comparative analysis of Korean Animation (KA), this paper studies the development of AE model in Colleges and universities in China. This paper discusses and analyzes the open learning methods in KA Education and the comparative analysis of learning methods in Chinese and Korean art education, and gives the improvement suggestions for the development of AE mode. Through the investigation and analysis of the purpose of Chinese and Korean students' learning animation and the learning methods of choosing AE and teaching, for the purpose of learning, most Chinese students account for 71% and 64% respectively for further study or employment development, and only 48% of the students learn animation because of interest; In comparison, 85% of Korean students study animation because of their interest. It can be seen that the different purposes of Chinese and Korean students learning animation also directly affect the AE mode; The proportion of Chinese students' receptive learning style is 71%; The proportion of open learning is 18%, and that of Korean students is only 18%; It can be seen that there are great differences between Chinese students and Korean students in learning methods, and the reform of Chinese AE is imperative.