Research on the legal framework of personal information privacy protection in automated administrative environment: centered on data security and rights balance

Authors

  • Zhongsen Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/9kwajf63

Keywords:

Automated administration, Personal information protection, Personal information in automated administration, Informed consent rules, Principle of least necessity.

Abstract

In the digital age, with the increasing importance of personal information, especially in the field of automated administration, the protection of personal information is particularly urgent. Ensuring the security of personal information in automated administration not only helps to safeguard the realization of individual dignity rights and meet the inherent requirements of the principle of proportionality, but also regulates the use of algorithms to avoid discrimination. However, although the legislation on the protection of personal information in automated administration has made some progress, there are still some shortcomings: the legislation is not directly specified, the law is not operable, the supervision and management mechanism is not perfect; There are also problems at the law enforcement level: improper use of immunity in administrative procedures, excessive expansion of the scope of personal information processing; In the relief aspect, there are also challenges: the provisions of administrative public interest litigation are vague, and there are loopholes in the way of liability. In order to improve the protection mechanism of personal information in automated administration, it is necessary to expand the direct regulation of automated administration in legislation, enhance the operability of laws, and improve the supervision and management mechanism of personal information. At the same time, it is also necessary to amend the administrative due process and strictly implement the principle of least necessity at the level of law enforcement. In terms of relief, the applicable rules of administrative public interest litigation should be clarified, and more targeted ways of assigning blame should be established.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Zhan Penghe. Review on the Legitimacy of power in Digital administrative Mode [J]. China Law School, 2021 (03) : 114-116.

Chen Yang, Pei Yanan. On Application Risk and Prevention Path of Algorithm decision Making in Automated Administration [J]. Law, 2021 (01) : 75.

Ao Shuanghong. On Automated Administration and its Legal Regulation [J]. Journal of Hunan Police College, 2017 (01) : 84-85.

Special system logic and regulation strategy of Sensitive Personal Information protection [J]. Administrative Law Studies, 2022 (01) : 119-130.]

Huang Xuexian. Research on the Principle of Proportion in Administrative Law [J]. Science of Law, 2001 (01) : 72-73.

[Li Yuan. Research on Personal Information protection in Big Data era [D]. Chongqing: Southwest University of Political Science and Law, 2016:52-53.]

Ye Bifeng. The Humanistic Spirit of Administrative Law [M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2005:114-115.

[Ma Yanxin. Digital Government: Change and rule of Law [M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 202:361-362.]

Zha Yunfei. Academic Basis and Functional Orientation of Automation of Administrative Discretion [J]. Administrative Law Studies, 2021 (03) : 114-124.

Ma Yanxin. Administrative Punishment under automated administrative mode: Challenges and Responses [J]. Politics and Law, 2020 (04) : 139-148.

Li Qing. Why Automated administrative Punishment is Just [J]. Learning and Exploration, 2022 (02) : 72-81.

HartzogW ContiG, NelsonJ, etal. InefficientlyAutomatedLawEnforcement [J]. J Michigan State Law Review, 2015 (02) : 1769.

Wang Zhengxin. Why Machine Discretion: Automation of Administrative punishment discretion and its risk control [J]. Administrative Law Studies, 2022 (02) : 166-176.

He Xiaoli, Yang Xingmei. Research on the path of orderly Promoting the second batch of government services: based on the investigation of Qingdao City [J]. Journal of Qingdao Administration College, Party School of the CPC Qingdao Municipal Committee, 2021 (01) : 46-52.

Zha Y F.Health code: Automated rating and utilization of individual epidemic risk [J]. Zhejiang Journal, 2020 (03) : 28-35. (in Chinese)

Bao Kun. Restriction of proportionality principle in normalizing application of health code data [J]. E-government, 2021 (01) : 32-41.

Ding Xiaodong. Personal Information Legislation in the era of big Data and Artificial Intelligence: On the challenge of new technologies to information privacy [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (Social Science Edition), 2020 (03) : 8-16.

Zhang Linghan. Conflict and Reconciliation between Algorithmic automated decision-making and administrative due process system [J]. Eastern Jurisprudence, 2020 (06) : 4-17.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhang, Z. (2024). Research on the legal framework of personal information privacy protection in automated administrative environment: centered on data security and rights balance. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(3), 337-348. https://doi.org/10.54691/9kwajf63