Ethical Regulation of Fintech Innovation Based on Big Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/mermyn26Keywords:
FinTech Ethics; Technological Innovation; Systemic Risk; Ethical Regulation.Abstract
The innovative integration of fintech drives the digital transformation of finance, it also brings about technological alienation, prompting a shift in ethical perspectives. This paper, from a historical perspective, traces the trajectory of the evolution of technological ethics from a purely rational tool to a comprehensive reflection on social impact. Focusing on the field of fintech, the study systematically explores the essence of fintech ethics across four levels: micro to macro, proximal to distal causes, static and dynamic, endogenous and exogenous. From an ontological perspective, it constructs a hierarchical structure of fintech ethics encompassing four dimensions: individual, organizational, societal, and global community. Under the associative effects of intelligent financial systems, the process of constructing the sociality and relationality of fintech ethics is reexamined, breaking free from the traditional dichotomy between technology and ethics. By introducing a relational perspective, the paper aims to effectively address the systemic risks brought by artificial intelligence in the financial sector through the construction of a complex ethics framework, which incorporates systems thinking, adaptive governance, multi-stakeholder collaborative governance, and adherence to ethical boundaries. The goal is to leverage ethical considerations to drive the reform and optimization of the financial regulatory system, ensuring the steady progress of the fintech industry.
Downloads
References
H.Jonas: Das Prinzip Verantwortung:Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation (Insel Verlag, Germany 1979),p.201-202.
János Müller, and dám Kerényi:The Need for Trust and Ethics in the Digital Age-Sunshine and Shadows in the FinTech World, Financial and Economic Review 18(2019),p.9.
David S. Rubenstein:Acquiring Ethical AI,Florida Law Review 73, no. 4 ( 2021),p.750.
P. Schueffel: Taming the Beast: A Scientific Definition of Fintech, Journal of Innovation Management Vol. 4 (2016), p.32.
Kirin Goff & Anitha Ramadoss:Smoke-Free Apartment Laws and Indoor Air Quality in U.S. Jurisdictions, 32 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. (2023), p.620-621.
L. Li: Data Ethics and Algorithm Ethics (Science Press, China 2019) ,p.74.
Puri, A. : Moral Imitation: Can an Algorithm Really Be Ethical? ,Social Science Research Network (2020),p.48.
Cheng, X: Research outline of ethics of science and technology. (Beijing Normal University Publication Hose, China 2007),p.81-88.
André Cournand: The code of the scientist and its relationship to ethics,Science 18.3(1978), p.239.
Courtenage, S. :Intelligent machines, collectives, and moral responsibility, AI and Ethics (2023),p.496.
A. Sen: Ethics and Economics(Commercial Press, China 2000),p.8.
Jones, Lindsay Sain, & Maynard, Goldburn P. Jr.: Unfulfilled promises of the fintech revolution, California Law Review, (2023),p.801.
WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM. navigating uncharted waters: a roadmap to responsible innovation with AI in financial services[R/OL]. 2022.
FINANCIAL STABILITY BOARD. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in financial services: Market developments and financial stability implications[R/OL]. implications[R/OL]. 2017.
BUNDESANSTALT FÜR FINANZDIENSTLEISTUNGSAUFSICHT. supervisory requirements for IT in financial institutions[Z]. 2018.
Mariarosaria Taddeo:Luciano Floridi,How AI can be a force forgood,Science361,(2018),p.751.
Ekaterinasvetlova:AI Ethics and Systemic Risks in Finance, AI and Ethics (2022),p.721.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




