Procuratorial Ethics in the Lenient System of Confession and Punishment

Authors

  • Yu Ye

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202409_7(9).0013

Keywords:

Confession and Punishment Leniency; Procuratorial Ethics; Relationship between Prosecution and Defense; Judicial Integrity.

Abstract

The procuratorial organ is the leading organ of the system of leniency on admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment. It is responsible for many important functions such as supervision, consultation, procedure advancement and sentencing suggestion. Its influence can radiate the criminal procedure from beginning to end. Whether the system of confession and punishment can be well implemented requires not only external institutional norms, but also the internal driving force and binding force of procuratorial ethics. From the perspective of the main structure of criminal proceedings, this paper demonstrates in detail the leading role of procuratorial ethics in the case of confession and punishment, and clarifies the due state of procuratorial ethics in the case of confession and punishment from the three dimensions of normative level, conceptual level and technical level, and summarizes the actual state of the lack of procuratorial ethics in the specific case handling process. Finally, from the three levels of value orientation, fact finding and penalty discretion, the construction path of procuratorial ethics norms of the leniency system of confession and punishment in China is gradually introduced to promote the improvement of the leniency system of confession and punishment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Yang Jianping, Guo Pengfei, He Dahai. Dilemma and solution of the practice of leniency on admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment [ J ].Chinese Journal of Prisons, 2021 ( 05 ) : 56-60.

Zheng Huiwen. The logical coupling between the role of public security organs and the system of leniency on admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment and its realization path-Analysis based on role theory [ J ].Journal of Jinan University ( Social Science Edition ), 2024 ( 03 ) : 164-176.

Tian Liwen, Nan Ying, Zhang Shuyuan, etc. Research report on improving the system of leniency on admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment [ J ].China Applied Law, 2024 ( 02 ) : 108-116.

Zhao Heng. The challenges and countermeasures of the application of the people 's juror system in the trial of cases of confession and punishment [ J ].Jurisprudence of Jiaotong University, 2024 ( 02 ) : 51-68.

Sun Daocui. Re-improvement of the leniency system of confession and punishment : taking the governance of minor crimes as the field [ J ].Inner Mongolia Sociology, 2024 ( 02 ) : 122-130.

Guo Heng. Conflicts of defense under the leniency system of confession and punishment [ J ]. Journal of Northeastern University ( Social Science Edition ), 2024 ( 01 ) : 117-125.

Wang Haiyan. ' Trial-centered ' from the perspective of the lenient system of confession and punishment [ J ]. Chinese Law, 2023 ( 06 ) : 62-80.

Liu Jun. The penalty mechanism of the incentive lenient system of confession and punishment [ J ]. Legal Science ( Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law ). 2023 ( 06 ) : 58-69.

Xu Shenjian.Prosecution and defense ethics in the system of leniency on admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment. [ J ] Journal of China University of Political Science and Law, 2023 ( 05 ) : 54-61.

Chen Xingliang. The doctrinal reflection on the leniency system of confession and punishment from the dual perspective of procedure and entity [ J ]. Political and Legal Forum, 2023 ( 05 ) : 3-14.

Zhang Wei. The practical investigation and mechanism promotion of the leniency system of confession and punishment in drug crime cases [ J ].Law Application, 2023 ( 06 ) : 167-176.

Xie Xiaojian. In the case of leniency on admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment, [ J ] Global Legal Review, 2023 ( 02 ) : 193-209.

Han Xu. [ J ]. Law Forum, 2022 ( 06 ) : 90-99.

Chen Wencong. On the relationship between the reform of trial centralism and the lenient system of confession and punishment [ J ].Journal of East China University of Political Science and Law, 2022 ( 05 ) : 171-179.

Qin Zongwen.Prosecutor 's role in the sentencing proposal system [ J ].Legal quotient research, 2022 ( 02 ) : 36-48.

Wei Xiaona.Prosecution and defense relationship in the system of leniency on admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment [ J ].Chinese Journal of Criminal Law, 2021 ( 06 ) : 52-66.

Ye Qing. From the perspective of procedural justice, the dimension of communication between procuratorial organs in the system of leniency on admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment [ J ].Politics and law, 2021 ( 12 ) : 70-81.

Yang Yuguan, Wang Yang. 'Procuratorial dominance ' in cases of pleading guilty and accepting punishment : operational characteristics, attribution logic and normative path [ J ].Journal of Henan Normal University ( Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition ), 2021,48 ( 02 ) : 54-60.

Lu Yang. ' Procuratorial dominance ' connotation analysis, power composition and practical trend [ J ].Journal of China University of Political Science and Law, 2021 ( 03 ) : 253-265. [ 20 ] Li Jianhua, Qu Yu.

Li Jianhua, Qu Yu.Procuratorial power ethics : structure, significance and rationality [ J ].Zhongzhou Academic Journal, 2021 ( 01 ) : 97-106.

Long Zongzhi.The key to improving the system of leniency on admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment is the balance between prosecution and defense [ J ].Global Law Review, 2020 ( 02 ) : 5-22.

Luo Yong. Liu Zhiyuan. Ethical Review of Procuratorial Supervision in Civil Execution Procedure [ J ]. People 's Forum, 2015 ( 14 ) : 125-127.

Long Zongzhi. Objective Obligations of Prosecutors and Construction of Judicial Ethics [ J ]. Journal of National College of Public Prosecutors, 2015 ( 03 ) : 21-32 + 172-173.

Xie Pengcheng. Reconstruction of the concept of procuratorial culture [ J ].Journal of the National Prosecutor 's College, 2013 ( 03 ) : 40-48.

Chen Weidong. Research on Sentencing Recommendations for Pleading Guilty and Accepting Punishment Cases [ J ].Legal Research, 2020 ( 05 ) : 158-174.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ye, Yu. 2024. “Procuratorial Ethics in the Lenient System of Confession and Punishment”. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research 7 (9): 89-97. https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202409_7(9).0013.