On the Differences and Coordination between Tax Accounting and Financial Accounting

Authors

  • Xiyue Han

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/yzzxbx15

Keywords:

Tax Accounting; Financial Accounting; Difference Analysis; Coordination Paths; Enterprise Management.

Abstract

In modern enterprise management, tax accounting and financial accounting, as two major pillars of the accounting field, are intrinsically related but exhibit significant differences in terms of accounting basis, objects, and principles. With the deepening of the market economy and the improvement of tax and accounting systems, the coordination between the two has become a key issue in enterprise operations and regulatory frameworks. Based on their core definitions, this paper systematically analyzes the necessity of coordination-including reducing accounting costs, mitigating tax risks, and adapting to market economic development. It further elaborates on the specific differences in accounting basis, accounting objects, and accounting principles, and proposes coordination paths from three perspectives: improving institutional coordination mechanisms, strengthening internal corporate collaboration, and enhancing the competence of practitioners. The study aims to provide theoretical support for enterprises to achieve efficient integration of tax and financial accounting, thereby helping enterprises cope with complex economic environments, reduce operational risks, and enhance overall competitiveness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Rutter, J. (2013). The strange case of Non-Ministerial Departments. London: Institute for Government.

[2] Gribnau, H. (2015b). Corporate social responsibility and tax planning: Not by rules alone. Social and Legal Studies, 24, 225–250.

[3] Radcliffe, V. S., Spence, C., Stein, M., & Wilkinson, B. (2019). Professional repositioning during times of institutional changes: The case of tax practitioners and changing moral boundaries. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 66, 45–59.

[4] De Simone, L., Sansing, R. C., & Seidman, J. K. (2013). When are enhanced relationship tax compliance programs mutually beneficial? The Accounting Review, 88, 1971–1991.

[5] Salazar, N. B. (2012). Tourism imaginaries: A conceptual approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 39, 863–882.

[6] Currie, G., Tuck, P., & Morell, K. (2015). How hybrid managers act as ’canny customers’ to accelerate policy reform: A case study of regulator-regulatee relationships in the UK’s tax agency. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28, 1291–1309.

[7] Guénin-Paracini, H., Malsch, B., & Tremblay, M. S. (2015). On the operational reality of auditors’ independence: Lessons from the field. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34, 201–236.

[8] Sandfort, J., & Phinney, R. (2017). Exploring how the strategic action framework illuminates coproduction: Seeing the utility of material artefacts. Washington, DC: Study Group on Coproduction of Public Services.

[9] Christensen, R. C., & Hearson, M. (2019). The new politics of global tax governance: Taking stock a decade after the financial crisis. Review of International Political Economy, 26, 1068–1988.

[10] Rogers, H., & Oats, L. (2021). Transfer pricing: Changing views in changing times. Accounting Forum, 1–25. Early access. https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2021.1926778

Downloads

Published

2025-08-27

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Han, Xiyue. 2025. “On the Differences and Coordination Between Tax Accounting and Financial Accounting”. Scientific Journal of Economics and Management Research 7 (8): 50-55. https://doi.org/10.54691/yzzxbx15.