Interpreted Speech Delivery Training Model: A Case Study of Utilizing a Translation Company’s WeChat Channel

Yan Lin

doi:10.54691/c01eh010

Authors

Yan Lin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/c01eh010

Keywords:

Interpreted speech delivery, cooperation, WeChat channel, translation company.

Abstract

Based on the reflection on the students’ interpreting performance, classroom teaching efficiency, the cooperation with a leading translation company YGym, and the responsibility of training interpreters, this study conducted a case study on training third-year undergraduate students in interpreted speech delivery. Under the guidance of Activity Theory, the teacher developed a training model “Search + Listen + Repeat + Deliver” using YGym’s WeChat channel. 70 students from two classes were divided into a control group and an experimental group. They took a pre-test in week 2 to assess their interpreted speech delivery. From week 3 to week 16, students in the experimental group participated in activities followed by this model with self-reflection. In week 17, all students took the post-test. A comparison of students' scores revealed that the training model “Search + Listen + Repeat + Deliver”, integrated with YGym’s WeChat channel, significantly improved the students’ interpreted speech delivery. Additionally, this study explores an efficient way to establish effective cooperation with a translation company, fostering a significant partnership between the university and the industry. It not only promotes in-depth cooperation for future programs focused on training student interpreters and providing them with job opportunities, but also offers ways for teachers and translation companies to work together in training interpreting learners using social media platforms like WeChat channels.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Cai Rendong, Dong Yanping: Interpreter training and students of interpreting in China. Journal of Translation Studies, Vol.16 (2015) No. 4, p. 167-191.

[2] Xue Sijia, Churchill D: Educational affordances of mobile social media for language teaching and learning: a Chinese teacher’s perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, Vol.35 (2022) No. 4, p.918-947.

[3] Cai Rendong, Dong Yanping: Interpreter training and students of interpreting in China. Journal of Translation Studies, Vol.16 (2015) No. 4, p. 167-191.

[4] Sandrelli A, Jerez JDM: The Impact of information and communication technology on interpreter training. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, Vol.1 (2007) No. 2, p. 269-303.

[5] Dong Yanping, Li Yinghui and Zhao Nan: Acquisition of interpreting strategies by student interpreters. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, Vol.13 (2019) No. 4, p. 408-425.

[6] Ko L: Teaching interpreting by distance mode: an empirical study. Meta, Vol.53 (2008) No. 4, p. 814-840.

[7] Orlando M: Interpreting training and digital pen technology. AIIC Webzine, (2013), No. 62.

[8] Sandrelli A: Designing CAIT (computer-assisted interpreter training) tools: Black Box. In MuTra 2005–Challenges of Multidimensional Translation: Conference Proceedings (pp. 2-6).

[9] Al-Jarf R: Text-to-speech software as a resource for independent interpreting practice by undergraduate interpreting students. International Journal of Translation and Interpretation Studies, Vol.2 (2022) No. 2, p. 32-39.

[10] Le P, Vu H and Tran M: Improving EFL students' intonation in-text using shadowing technique with the implementation of Google text-to-speech. AsiaCALL Online Journal, Vol.13 (2022) No. 1, p. 93-121.

[11] Yenkimaleki M, Heuven VJ: The effect of fluency training on interpreter trainees’ speech fluency, comprehensibility, and accentedness: An experimental study. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol.38 (2025) No. 1, p. 107-133.

[12] OKAY Ş: Pamukkale Üniversitesi Öğretim Elemanlarının Üniversite-Sanayi İşbirliği Çalışmalarına Bakışları Üzerine Bir Alan Araştırması, Journal of Technical-Online Teknik Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu, Vol.8 (2009) No. 2, p. 94-111.

[13] Ciritcioğlu H, Aydın M and Şenol S: A case study of university-industry cooperation. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology, Vol.2 (2016) No. 2, p. 89-95.

[14] Bercovitz J, Feldman M: Entpreprenerial universities and technology transfer: A conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. The journal of technology transfer, Vol.31 (2006), p. 175-188.

[15] Valentín EMM: University—industry cooperation: A framework of benefits and obstacles. Industry and Higher Education, Vol.14 (2000) No. 3, p. 165-172.

[16] Rodriguez CA, Ciurana J and Elías A: Industry and university cooperation to enhance manufacturing education. Journal of manufacturing systems, Vol.24 (2005) No. 3, p. 277-287.

[17] Bektaş C, Tayauova G: A model suggestion for improving the efficiency of higher education: university–industry cooperation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol.116 (2014), p. 2270-2274.

[18] Awasthy R, Flint S, et al: A framework to improve university–industry collaboration. Journal of Industry-University Collaboration, Vol.2 (2020) No. 1, p.49-62.

[19] Cao Daqin, Chen Jianfen and Liu Shijie: University–industry collaboration in managing translation projects: perceptions and responses from students, instructors, and industry partners. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol.67 (2024) No. 3, p. 352-368.

[20] Information on: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1155/2021/7054016

[21] Liao Xianjiu, Li Yan, et al: Research and practice of flip classroom based on WeChat platform combined with formative evaluation in teaching. Creative Education, Vol.11 (2020)No.8, p. 1552.

[22] Yi Meiyun:The influence of short videos on elementary school students’ English reading ability: Taking WeChat channels as an example. SHS Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences, Vol. 199 (2024), p.1-9.

[23] Chen Tao: Classical music education in China: The effectiveness of the WeChat social media platform and its impact on the communicative and cognitive skills of music students. Education and Information Technologies, Vol.29 (2024), p. 17467-17483.

[24] Information on: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1155/2021/7054016

[25] Jonassen DH, Rohrer-Murphy L: Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol.47 (1999)No.1, p. 61-79.