Investigation and Influencing Factor Analysis of Residents' Traditional Chinese Medicine Health Literacy in Tianjin During the Post-Pandemic Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/4hzhs119Keywords:
Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) Health Literacy; Post-Pandemic Era; Urban-Rural Disparities; Influencing Factors.Abstract
Background: Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) exhibits distinctive strengths in public health initiatives and chronic disease control, where population-level TCM health literacy serves as a critical determinant of its practical efficacy. Current research predominantly examines rural populations in central and western China, leaving a gap in understanding urban residents' TCM literacy during the post-COVID-19 period. This investigation evaluates TCM health literacy status and determinants among Tianjin residents to inform policy development. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 320 participants (aged 16-69) from Nankai and Jinghai Districts, selected through stratified multistage random sampling. The assessment tool, modified from the standardized "Chinese Citizens' TCM Health Literacy Scale," measured five competency domains: fundamental TCM principles, public health applications, lifestyle practices, cultural knowledge, and information processing capabilities. Statistical analyses (SPSS 26.0) encompassed descriptive statistics, univariate tests, and multivariate linear regression modeling. Results: Only 17.2% of residents achieved a high level of TCM health literacy (total score ≥80). Among the dimensions, healthy lifestyles (66.41±24.65) and basic concepts (63.71±34.79) scored higher, while residents performed weakest in TCM cultural knowledge (50.10±32.80) and information comprehension (43.88±31.00). Multiple regression analysis revealed that education level (β=3.340, p<0.01), occupation (β=0.748, p<0.05), daily TCM usage (β=7.376, p<0.01), and recognition of TCM efficacy (β=13.388, p<0.01) significantly positively influenced literacy levels; age (β=-2.340, p<0.01) and self-rated health status (β=-1.979, p<0.05) had negative effects. Urban-rural disparities were significant, with urban residents (58.6±14.3) exhibiting higher literacy levels than rural residents (49.5±15.2). Conclusion: The overall TCM health literacy level among Tianjin residents is relatively low, with notable disparities across urban-rural areas, age groups, and education levels. It is recommended to enhance TCM cultural promotion, optimize resource allocation in rural areas, and implement health education targeting middle-aged, elderly, and low-education populations to improve nationwide TCM health literacy.
Downloads
References
[1] Cramer Holger.(2023).The World Health Organization Traditional Medicine Strategy: Enhancing Healthcare Access, Health Equity, and Health Choices Worldwide. Journal of integrative and complementary medicine.
[2] LING J, SUN C X, ZHANG X X, et al. Traditional Chinese Medicine Health Literacy in Rural Hunan: A Cross-Sectional Study[J]. Journal of Integrative Medicine, 2023, 21(4): 345-356.
[3] Zhang, X. (2020). Assessment of TCM health literacy in Jiangxi Province. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 36(5), 789–795.
[4] State Council of the People's Republic of China. (2022). The 14th five-year plan for the development of traditional Chinese medicine(2021–2025).
[5] Tianjin Municipal People's Government. (2023). Tianjin action plan for building a leading TCM city (2023–2025). Tianjin: Author.
[6] Nutbeam, D. (2008). The evolving concept of health literacy. Social Science & Medicine, 67(12), 2072–2078.
[7] Wang, L., Li, Y., Chen, Z., et al. (2021). TCM health literacy and chronic disease management in urban China. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, 21(1), 112.
[8] Liu, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, Q., et al. (2022). Impact of COVID-19 on public acceptance of traditional medicine. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 876543.
[9] Chen, Z., Wu, X., Li, T., et al. (2019). Urban-rural disparities in health literacy: Evidence from China. Health Policy and Planning, 34(6), 423–431.
[10] Li, X., Wang, L., Liu, Y., et al. (2020). TCM
[11] Sun, Q., Huang, J., Li, M., et al. (2021). Digital health literacy and TCM: Opportunities and challenges. Telemedicine and e-Health, 27(8), 912–920.
[12] Hu, S., Zhou, L., Mao, J., et al. (2022). Policy support and TCM development in China. Health Economics Review, 12(1), 25.
[13] Yang, J., Zhang, W., Liu, R., et al. (2020). Age and health literacy: A cross-sectional study in Eastern China. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 20(5), 456–462.
[14] Zhou, M., Gao, Y., Li, X., et al. (2021). TCM in public health emergencies: Lessons from COVID-19. American Journal of Chinese Medicine, 49(3), 567–582.
[15] Gao, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, F., et al. (2022). Education level and health literacy: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2345.
[16] Tianjin Health Commission. (2023). The 14th five-year plan for TCM development in Tianjin. Tianjin: THC.
[17] Wei, F., Chen, L., Zhang, Y., et al. (2021). Self-rated health and TCM utilization in elderly populations. Aging & Mental Health, 25(7), 1234–1240.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Scientific Journal Of Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.





