The Influence of Slang on Daily Communication in Different Scenes and Frequencies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/2dn2p029Keywords:
Slang; English communication; Information transmission; Emotional expression; Interactive efficiency.Abstract
In this study, focusing on the influence on information transmission, emotional expression and interactive efficiency, the influence of slang on English communication in various contexts and frequencies was investigated. This study collected data from 101 native English speakers and 110 non-native English speakers to explore the role of slang in promoting social contact and understanding. The results showed that when speakers use polite slang, it can enhance communication and construct harmonious relations. By contrast, when impolite slang is used, especially on formal occasions, it causes misunderstanding and social tension. The aforementioned results may shed light on the importance of pragmatic awareness in effective language use, especially in cross-cultural communication.
Downloads
References
[1] Eble, C. (1996). Slang and Sociability: In-group Language among College Students. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
[2] Mei, Y., Smith, J., & Tang, L. (2024). Digital slang: A new frontier in language evolution. Journal of New Media Studies.
[3] Merchant, G. (2001). The use of language play in online communities. In D. Barton & N. Lee (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. London: Routledge.
[4] Peng, H., & Sun, J. (2021). Cultural symbolism in modern slang. Cultural Linguistics Review, 12(1), 34-48.
[5] Fürst, M. , & Grin, F. (2023). Linguistic creativity in digital communication: The role of slang. Journal of Language and Social Psychology.
[6] Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4-5), 585-614.
[7] Crystal, D. (2004). The Stories of English. London: Penguin.
[8] Trudgill, P. (2000). Sociolinguistics: An Introduction to Language and Society. London: Penguin.
[9] Eckert, P. (2000). Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.
[10] Alim, H.S., & Smitherman, G. (2012). Articulate While Black: Barack Obama, Language, and Race in the U.S. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[11] Kiesling, S. (2004). Dude. American Speech, 79(3), 281-305.
[12] Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
[13] Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S.M., Green, C.A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544.
[14] Denscombe, M. (2014). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
[15] Couper, M. P. (2017). Designing effective web surveys. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[16] Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey research methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
[17] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Scientific Journal Of Humanities and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
