Research on the Division of Tort Liability in Driverless Vehicle Accidents
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/6ybt5249Keywords:
Driverless vehicle, division of tort liability, principal liability, criterion of liability, compulsory liability insurance.Abstract
Driverless vehicles significantly liberate drivers from manual control, reduce traffic accident risks, and safeguard public safety and property security. Yet, due to the system-controlled nature and imperfect legal regulations, the division of tort liability in driverless vehicle accidents remains ambiguous, necessitating an adapted accountability framework. Based on clarifying the conceptual scope of driverless vehicles, it is essential to delineate shifts in liability proportions for traffic accidents compared to traditional vehicles, adjust and introduce compulsory liability insurance for driverless driving modes, and appropriately strengthen manufacturer obligations. Considering the transitional historical phase of driverless vehicles, an applicable criterion of liability framework for traffic accidents should be established and substantiated. The burgeoning driverless vehicle technology remains in flux regarding both technical standards and application paradigms. Delineating tort liability must not only operate within existing legal frameworks but also judiciously balance between regulating risks of emerging technologies and fostering their innovative development, thereby supporting the driverless vehicle sector and safeguarding public legal rights.
Downloads
References
[1] Wang Ye. Analysis of Tort Liability Issues in Driverless Vehicle Traffic Accidents [J]. Journal of Qiqihar University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2021, (08): 109-114.
[2] Yang Yulin. Research on Tort Liability of Driverless Vehicles in Road Traffic Accidents in China [J]. Theoretic Observation, 2019, (03): 115–117.
[3] Zheng Huihua. Environmental Perception and Localization Technologies for Driverless Vehicles [J]. Market Regulation and Quality Technology Research, 2024, (05): 56-59.
[4] Zhu Yu. Review of Path Planning Algorithms for Driverless Vehicles [J]. Internal Combustion Engine & Parts, 2023, (24): 81-84.
[5] Wang Haoyu, Zuo Zhiqiang, Deng Yuxiang, et al. Review on Motion Control of Driverless Vehicles [J]. Control Theory and Applications, 2024, 41(09): 1507-1522.
[6] Antonio Davola. A Model for Tort Liability in a World of Driverless Cars[J]. Idaho Law Review ,2018, Volume 54 Number 3 Article 2.
[7] N. R Fulbright. Autonomous vehicles: The legal landscape of dedicated short range communication in the US, UK and Germany,2017.
[8] Cheng Xiao. Tort Liability Law [M]. Beijing: Law Press, 2015: 419–420.
[9] Yang Lixin. Tort Liability Law [M]. Beijing: Law Press, 2018: 42–43.
[10] Ji Ruowang. Typological Study on Smart Vehicle Tort Liability: A Path Based on Graded Proportional Liability [J]. Journal of Nanjing University (Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences), 2020, 57(02): 120-131+160.
[11] Yang Lixin (Ed.). Research on Road Traffic Accident Liability [M]. Beijing: Law Press, 2009: 178–179.
[12] Liu Yunjiang, Li Baoyuan. On Compulsory Liability Insurance for Driverless Vehicles [J]. Finance and Accounting Monthly, 2020, (24): 130-138.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Scientific Journal Of Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.





