A Multi-Objective Optimization Model for Sustainable Supply Chain Network Design under Uncertainty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/dghzn170Keywords:
Sustainable supply chain network design, multi-objective optimization, robust optimization, uncertainty modeling.Abstract
Under the global carbon neutrality agenda and increasing supply chain uncertainties, designing supply chain networks that balance economic, environmental, and social sustainability has become a strategic priority for enterprises. This paper proposes a Robust Optimization-based Multi-Objective Mixed Integer Programming model (ROMO-MIP) to address sustainable supply chain network design under uncertainties such as demand fluctuations, carbon price volatility, and supply disruptions. The model simultaneously optimizes three objectives: minimizing total cost, minimizing carbon emissions, and maximizing job creation and regional equity. The -constraint method and the NSGA-III algorithm are employed to generate the Pareto front, and an empirical case study is conducted on the lithium-ion battery supply chain for new energy vehicles in China. Results show that incorporating robustness parameters significantly enhances network resilience under uncertainty, while multi-objective trade-off analysis enables decision-makers to select optimal configurations aligned with policy priorities. This study provides a practical decision-support tool for firms seeking green transformation and resilient operations.
Downloads
References
[1] Carter C R. Purchasing and social responsibility: a replication and extension[J]. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2004, 40(3): 4-16.
[2] Seuring S, Müller M. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2008, 16(15): 1699-1710.
[3] Tang C S. Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions[J]. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 2006, 9(1): 33-45.
[4] Fan E, Li L, Wang Z, et al. Sustainable recycling technology for Li-ion batteries and beyond: challenges and future prospects[J]. Chemical reviews, 2020, 120(14): 7020-7063.
[5] Halberg N, van der Werf H M G, Basset-Mens C, et al. Environmental assessment tools for the evaluation and improvement of European livestock production systems[J]. Livestock Production Science, 2005, 96(1): 33-50.
[6] Elhedhli S, Merrick R. Green supply chain network design to reduce carbon emissions[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2012, 17(5): 370-379.
[7] Hasani A, Khosrojerdi A. Robust global supply chain network design under disruption and uncertainty considering resilience strategies: A parallel memetic algorithm for a real-life case study[J]. Transportation research part e: logistics and transportation review, 2016, 87: 20-52.
[8] Bertsimas D, Brown D B, Caramanis C. Theory and applications of robust optimization[J]. SIAM review, 2011, 53(3): 464-501.
[9] Gabrel V, Murat C, Thiele A. Recent advances in robust optimization: An overview[J]. European journal of operational research, 2014, 235(3): 471-483.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Scientific Journal Of Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.





