Bayesian Models for Evaluating the Role of Corporate Governance in Fisheries Economic Policy Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6911/WSRJ.202502_11(2).0007Keywords:
Corporate Governance, Fisheries Economic Policies, Bayesian Models, Policy Evaluation Sustainability, Resource Management, Bayesian Inference, Governance Mechanisms, Economic Outcomes, Fisheries Sector.Abstract
The intersection of corporate governance and economic policy has garnered significant attention in recent years, particularly in sectors where sustainability and resource management are critical. The fisheries industry, characterized by its unique challenges such as overfishing, resource depletion, and the need for equitable resource distribution, stands as a key area for examining how governance frameworks influence policy outcomes. Corporate governance mechanisms, which include decision-making structures, accountability, and stakeholder engagement, play a pivotal role in shaping the economic and environmental performance of fisheries policies. Despite the growing body of research in this domain, there remains a significant gap in understanding how these mechanisms can be quantitatively evaluated and optimized for better policy outcomes. This study seeks to fill this gap by employing advanced Bayesian models to assess the role of corporate governance in fisheries economic policies. The primary objective of this study is to explore and evaluate the intricate relationship between corporate governance and fisheries economic policy outcomes. Specifically, it aims to determine how governance practices influence the effectiveness of fisheries policies in achieving economic sustainability, environmental protection, and social equity. By focusing on these key dimensions, the research seeks to provide actionable insights for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and researchers aiming to enhance the performance of fisheries policies. Furthermore, this study aims to contribute to the broader discourse on governance and policy evaluation by demonstrating the utility of Bayesian statistical methods in this context. The methodology employed in this study centers around the development and application of Bayesian models. These models are particularly suited to policy evaluation as they allow for the incorporation of prior knowledge, the handling of uncertainty, and the generation of probabilistic inferences. The study utilizes a robust dataset comprising governance indicators, policy outcomes, and economic metrics from multiple fisheries sectors. Bayesian inference is used to estimate the relationship between governance variables and policy outcomes, enabling the identification of key drivers and bottlenecks. The models are further validated through diagnostic checks and sensitivity analyses to ensure their reliability and robustness. The use of advanced Bayesian techniques allows for a nuanced understanding of governance impacts and facilitates the simulation of alternative governance scenarios to predict potential policy outcomes. The findings of this study reveal several critical insights into the role of corporate governance in fisheries economic policies. First, effective governance practices are shown to significantly enhance the economic performance and sustainability of fisheries policies. Key governance factors, such as transparency, stakeholder participation, and accountability, emerge as strong predictors of positive policy outcomes. Second, the Bayesian approach provides a flexible and rigorous framework for evaluating these relationships, offering a clear advantage over traditional statistical methods. The study’s contributions are twofold: it advances the methodological toolkit available for policy evaluation and provides practical recommendations for improving governance practices in the fisheries sector. By bridging the gap between governance theory and policy implementation, this research highlights the importance of integrating robust governance frameworks into fisheries economic policies to achieve sustainable and equitable outcomes. In summary, this study underscores the critical role of corporate governance in shaping fisheries economic policy outcomes and demonstrates the utility of Bayesian models in policy evaluation. It provides valuable insights for enhancing governance practices, contributing to sustainable development in the fisheries sector, and advancing the broader field of governance and policy research.
Downloads
References
[1] Agrawal, A., & Ribot, J. (1999). Accountability in Decentralization: A Framework with South Asian and West African Cases. The Journal of Developing Areas, 33(4), 473–502. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.1999.0014
[2] Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as Adaptive Management. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1251–1262. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2
[3] Bromley, D. W. (1991). Environment and Economy: Property Rights and Public Policy. Blackwell.
[4] Burgess, M. G., Costello, C., & Gaines, S. D. (2017). Management Strategies for High-Seas Fisheries: Tuning Economic Incentives to Promote Sustainability. Science, 361(6396), 716–718. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat6019
[5] Cinner, J. E., Daw, T., & McClanahan, T. R. (2009). Socioeconomic Factors That Affect Artisanal Fishers’ Readiness to Exit a Declining Fishery. Conservation Biology, 23(1), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01041.x
[6] Cochrane, K. L., & Garcia, S. M. (2009). A Fishery Manager's Guidebook: Management Measures and Their Application. Wiley-Blackwell.
[7] Costello, C., Ovando, D., Hilborn, R., Gaines, S. D., Deschenes, O., & Lester, S. E. (2012). Status and Solutions for the World’s Unassessed Fisheries. Science, 338(6106), 517–520. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223389
[8] Elinor, O. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.
[9] FAO. (2020). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020. Sustainability in Action. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
[10] Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press.
[11] Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., & Rubin, D. B. (2013). Bayesian Data Analysis (3rd ed.). CRC Press.
[12] Grafton, R. Q., Hilborn, R., Squires, D., Tait, M., & Williams, M. (2010). Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management. Oxford University Press.
[13] Hilborn, R., & Walters, C. J. (1992). Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment: Choice, Dynamics, and Uncertainty. Springer.
[14] Jentoft, S., McCay, B., & Wilson, D. C. (1998). Social Theory and Fisheries Co-management. Marine Policy, 22(4–5), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-597X(97)00040-7
[15] Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Jentoft, S., & Pullin, R. (2005). Fish for Life: Interactive Governance for Fisheries. Amsterdam University Press.
[16] Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Alberti, M., Folke, C., Moran, E., & Taylor, W. W. (2007). Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems. Science, 317(5844), 1513–1516. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144004
[17] Ostrom, E. (2009). A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133
[18] Pauly, D., & Zeller, D. (2016). Catch Reconstructions Reveal That Global Marine Fisheries Catches Are Higher Than Reported and Declining. Nature Communications, 7, 10244. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10244
[19] Plummer, R. (2009). The Adaptive Co-management Process: An Initial Synthesis of Representative Models and Influential Variables. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03130-140224
[20] Punt, A. E., Smith, A. D. M., & Cui, G. (2001). Review of Progress in the Introduction of Management Strategy Evaluation (MSE) Approaches in Fisheries Management. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 58(4), 1017–1028. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2001.1059
[21] Rice, J. C., & Garcia, S. M. (2011). Fisheries, Food Security, Climate Change, and Biodiversity: Characteristics of the Sector and Perspectives on Emerging Issues. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 68(6), 1343–1353. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsr041
[22] Roy, N., & Epstein, G. (2017). The Role of Institutions in the Sustainability of Fisheries: A Review of Governance Challenges and Frameworks. Global Environmental Change, 46, 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.07.007
[23] Sethi, S. A., Branch, T. A., & Watson, R. (2010). Global Fishery Development Patterns Are Driven by Profit but Not Trophic Level. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(27), 12163–12167. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003236107
[24] Sterner, T., & Coria, J. (2012). Policy Instruments for Environmental and Natural Resource Management. Routledge.
[25] Worm, B., Hilborn, R., Baum, J. K., Branch, T. A., Collie, J. S., Costello, C., & Zeller, D. (2009). Rebuilding Global Fisheries. Science, 325(5940), 578–585. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1173146
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 World Scientific Research Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.



