The impact of carbon leakage controlling mechanisms on international trade: A review

Authors

  • Yingqi Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v23i.1393

Keywords:

Carbon Leakage, Border Adjustment, International Trade

Abstract

Proposition of Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism Since the "Kyoto Protocol" came into effect, developed countries have adopted strict policies to control the emission of greenhouse gases, and the topic of carbon leakage mechanism has attracted the attention of scholars. This article reviews the major academic works published in the past decade on carbon leakage and its control mechanisms. The works are categorized into "carbon leakage", "carbon leakage controlling mechanism" and "impacts on international trades" according to their research focuses. Clear patterns regarding transitions of their research focus and methodologies have emerged during the review process. This article revealed that during the past decade the perspective of relevant research has altered from unilateral (domestic) point of view to the multilateral view, the focus has moved from the developed world (the EU in particular) to the developing world (like China and India), and the research method has incorporated more and more quantitative models to gain insights from multi-dimensional data. Despite that this work is neither exhaustive nor vital for unsettling matters of climate bargaining, the review shed light on what can be borrowed, what can be avoided and what requires more trial-and-error attempts to modify and adapt mature climate mechanisms for developing economies like China.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lin, B. and C. Sun, Evaluating carbon dioxide emissions in international trade of China. Energy policy, 2010. 38(1): p. 613-621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.014

Elliott, J., et al., Trade and carbon taxes. American Economic Review, 2010. 100(2): p. 465-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.2.465

Wang, Q. and X. Yang, Imbalance of carbon embodied in South-South trade: Evidence from China-India trade. Science of the Total Environment, 2020. 707: p. 134473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134473

Kuik, O. and M. Hofkes, Border adjustment for European emissions trading: Competitiveness and carbon leakage. Energy policy, 2010. 38(4): p. 1741-1748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.048

Gros, D. and C. Egenhofer, The case for taxing carbon at the border. Climate Policy, 2011. 11(5): p. 1262-1268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2011.592669

Wang, X. and T. Voituriez, China's export tax and export vat refund rebate on energy-intensive goods and their consequences for climate change. 2010.

Wang, X., J. Li, and Y. Zhang, Can export tax be genuine climate policy? An analysis on China’s export tax and export VAT refund rebate policies. An Analysis on China’s Export Tax and Export VAT Refund Rebate Policies (January 10, 2011), 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1737945

Voituriez, T. and X. Wang, Getting the carbon price right through climate border measures: a Chinese perspective. Climate Policy, 2011. 11(5): p. 1257-1261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2011.601615

Fischer, C. and A.K. Fox, Comparing policies to combat emissions leakage: Border carbon adjustments versus rebates. Journal of Environmental Economics and management, 2012. 64(2): p. 199-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2012.01.005

Böhringer, C., K.E. Rosendahl, and H.B. Storrøsten, Robust policies to mitigate carbon leakage. Journal of Public Economics, 2017. 149: p. 35-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.03.006

Goulder, L.H. and A.R. Schein, Carbon taxes versus cap and trade: a critical review. Climate Change Economics, 2013. 4(03): p. 1350010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007813500103

Deng, G. and Y. Xu, Accounting and structure decomposition analysis of embodied carbon trade: A global perspective. Energy, 2017. 137: p. 140-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.064

Jevnaker, T. and J. Wettestad, Ratcheting up carbon trade: The politics of reforming EU emissions trading. Global Environmental Politics, 2017. 17(2): p. 105-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00403

Sun, Y., et al., A dynamic and continuous allowances allocation methodology for the prevention of carbon leakage: Emission control coefficients. Applied Energy, 2019. 236: p. 220-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.095

Van Asselt, H. and T. Brewer, Addressing competitiveness and leakage concerns in climate policy: An analysis of border adjustment measures in the US and the EU. Energy Policy, 2010. 38(1): p. 42-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.061

Van Asselt, H. and F. Biermann, European emissions trading and the international competitiveness of energy-intensive industries: a legal and political evaluation of possible supporting measures. Energy Policy, 2007. 35(1): p. 497-506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.12.013

Dröge, S., et al., Tackling leakage in a world of unequal carbon prices. 2009: JSTOR.

Monjon, S. and P. Quirion, A border adjustment for the EU ETS: Reconciling WTO rules and capacity to tackle carbon leakage. Climate Policy, 2011. 11(5): p. 1212-1225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2011.601907

Böhringer, C., A. Lange, and T.F. Rutherford, Optimal emission pricing in the presence of international spillovers: Decomposing leakage and terms-of-trade motives. Journal of Public Economics, 2014. 110: p. 101-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.11.011

Zhou, Y., et al., The impacts of carbon tariff on green supply chain design. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2015. 14(3): p. 1542-1555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2015.2445316

Böhringer, C., J.C. Carbone, and T.F. Rutherford, Embodied carbon tariffs. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 2018. 120(1): p. 183-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12211

Hotak, S., et al., Carbon emissions and carbon trade balances: International evidence from panel ARDL analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020. 27(19): p. 24115-24128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08478-w

Downloads

Published

2022-08-04