Forecasting Daily Stock Volatility: A Comparison between GARCH and Recurrent Neuro-networks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v38i.3723Keywords:
GARCH; Forecasting Volatility; Neuro-network.Abstract
Forecasting the volatility of financial derivatives and securities returns has always been the core of financial research. Accurate volatility forecast is integral to financial risk management, which is vital for investors and supervision authorities. Traditional time series models (e.g., ARCH and GARCH models) have been famous tools for volatility forecasting. However, those models cannot capture non-linear correlations, and prediction capability is unsatisfactory. In this paper, we use multifactorial deep learning algorithms RNN, LTSM, and GRU with sentiment data to predict the future volatility of Apple (AAPL), then compare the accuracy of prediction with the GARCH model. According to the analysis, the prediction accuracy of LSTM and GRU significantly improved compared with the GARCH model. These results shed light on guiding further exploration of stock volatility prediction using deep learning algorithms. Besides, it advises investors to choose efficient stock price volatility forecasting and risk management tools.
Downloads
References
Engle Robert F. Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation. Econometrica, 1982, 50(4): 987–1007.
Bollerslev T. Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of econometrics, 1986, 31(3): 307-27.
Sentana E. Quadratic ARCH models. The Review of Economic Studies, 1995, 62(4): 639-61.
Franses P H, Van Dijk D. Forecasting stock market volatility using (non-linear) GARCH models. Journal of forecasting, 1996, 15(3): 229-235.
Donaldson R G, Kamstra M. Forecast combining with neural networks. Journal of Forecasting, 1996, 15(1): 49-61.
Mantri J K, Gahan P, Nayak B B. Artificial neural networks–an application to stock market volatility. Soft-Computing in Capital Market: Research and Methods of Computational Finance for Measuring Risk of Financial Instruments, 2014, 179.
Liu Y, Qin Z, Li P, et al. Stock volatility prediction using recurrent neural networks with sentiment analysis. International Conference on Industrial, Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems, Springer, 2017, 192-201.
Aimin Z, Rui G. Research on Volatility Prediction Based on Deep Learning Algorithm—Example of SSE 50ETF Option. Huabei Finance, 2021, (09): 7.
Su Z, Xie H, Han L. Multi-factor RFG-LSTM algorithm for stock sequence predicting. Computational Economics, 2021, 57(4): 1041-1058.
Google. FAQ about Google Trends data. Trends Help, 2022, Retrieved from: https://support.google.com/trends/answer/4365533?hl=en&ref_topic=6248052
Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J. Long short-term memory. Neural computation, 1997, 9(8): 1735-1780.
Cho K, Van Merriënboer B, Gulcehre C, et al. Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.1078, 2014
Ioffe S, Szegedy C. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift, International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2015: 448-456.
Laurent C, Pereyra G, Brakel P, et al. Batch normalized recurrent neural network. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), IEEE, 2016: 2657-2661.






