Analysis of the Ownership Dispute between Vanke and Baoneng Acquisition and Anti-acquisition

Authors

  • Xiao Zeng

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v38i.3735

Keywords:

Vanke; Baoneng Group; Hostile takeover; Leveraged financing; Diffuse ownership.

Abstract

The planned acquisition of Vanke by Baoneng Group, which started in 2015, is the most typical acquisition and reverse takeover case of listed companies in the contemporary Chinese capital market. In view of the market supervision loophole in Baoneng Group's insurance capital listing, as well as the respective problems of the acquirer and the acquirer, this paper will carry out research to analyze and evaluate the case in detail. To be specific, the reasons for Baoneng's intended acquisition, the strategies adopted for the cases as well as the countermeasures of Vanke will be analyzed. Besides, the capital source and mode characteristics of Baoneng system will be explored, whose volume is significantly different from Vanke's, so as to draw inspiration from this case. According to the analysis, the hidden danger of Baoneng is that the investment is too aggressive, and the financing means are too risky. Moreover, Vanke's problems are a fragmented shareholding structure and loopholes in its articles of association. These results shed light on guiding further exploration of corporate governance structure and future domestic capital market development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

You Guiyun, Li Min, Wei Xueyan, Dou Haibin, Chen Jie. Analysis of the Reasons and Influences of Insurance Capital Placarding in the Capital Market. Insurance Theory and Practice, 2016(05):111-129.

Retrieved from: https://wenku.baidu.com/view/e90c6538874769eae009581b6bd97f192379bf45.html

Gao Mengqi. Case Analysis of Vanke Equity Dispute. Anhui University of Finance and Economics, 2017.

Zhang Xinyu. "Barbarians at the Door": Control Market and Corporate Governance. Nanjing University, 2017.

Qi Hong. From the “Battle of Wanbao” to see the financial supervision under the mixed operation and financial innovation in China. Southwest Finance, 2017(03):45-49.

Zhu Lei. Behind the Battle of Baowan. China Economic Report, 2016(04): 77-79

Yan Zihong, Yang Huaidong. Research on Hostile Takeover and M&A Defense of Listed Companies in my country: A Case Analysis Based on the "Battle-Wan War". Financial Theory and Teaching, 2016, (04): 28-33.

Li Weian, Qi Lujun, Li Yuanzhen. Interpretation of "Leveraged Buyout" from the Governance Enlightenment of "Baowan Battle". Tsinghua Financial Review, 2017(01): 34-37.

Liu Bao. Talking about the anti-takeover strategy of listed companies from the Baoneng Department's listing of Vanke stocks. China Business Review, 2015(34):74-76.

Wang Jiachen. Analysis of Anti-Takeover Strategy in the Battle of Wanbao. Modern Business, 201 (02): 151-152.

Han Weijing. A brief introduction to the anti-hostile takeover measures of listed companies——Taking the malicious takeover of Vanke by "Baoneng Department" as an example. Times Finance, 2017(12):151+160.

Liu Jiaorao, Zhou Yunlan, Liu Xiaorao. Analysis of the dispute over the control of Vanke. Finance and Accounting, 2017(15): 26-28.

Liu Hui. Why did Vanke not use the poison pill plan?. Board of Directors, 2016(02):60-61.

Dang Yin, Lu Tong. Looking at the Wanbao dispute from the perspective of corporate governance. China Finance, 2016(11): 52-53.

Wen Xiuying. Interpretation of Corporate Governance through the "Battle-Wan War". Statistics and Management, 2016(11):121-122.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-02

How to Cite

Zeng, X. (2023). Analysis of the Ownership Dispute between Vanke and Baoneng Acquisition and Anti-acquisition. BCP Business & Management, 38, 522-529. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v38i.3735