Design of evaluation system for higher vocational institutions based on AHP hierarchical analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpep.v5i.1569Keywords:
Institutional evaluation; AHP; Vocational education.Abstract
The development of higher vocational education is inseparable from a country's economic and social development and industrial structure development. Strengthening scientific evaluation of the development status of higher vocational education is an important prerequisite and foundation for scientifically promoting the development of higher vocational education. Educational evaluation is an effective scientific method for discovering the shortcomings of institutions' development and promoting their improvement. Based on this, it is important to construct a systematic, rich, measurable, forward-looking and robust as an evaluation index system. This paper uses a combination of subjective expert scoring and objective AHP hierarchical analysis to construct an evaluation system for higher vocational institutions, and comprehensively analyses the relative strength indicators and relative weakness indicators of each vocational institution, with a view to helping relevant institutions understand their overall development situation more comprehensively and objectively, and promoting the sustainable development of higher vocational education.
Downloads
References
O Loyola-González, et al. A Contrast Pattern-Based Scientometric Study of the QS World University Ranking. (IEEE Access 8,2020),p.1-1.
Gratzl, S. , et al. LineUp: Visual Analysis of Multi-Attribute Rankings. (IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics 19.12,2013),p.2277-2286.
Cheng, Ewl , and H. Li . Analytic hierarchy process. (Measuring Business Excellence 5.3,1997),p.30 - 37.
Saaty, T. L. . Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process.(International Journal of Services Sciences 1.1,2008),p.83-84.
Vaidya, O. S. , and S. Kumar . Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. (European Journal of Operational Research 169.1,2006),p.1-29.
Liu, J. J. , and Q. Liu . Design on the Evaluation Index System for Education Quality of the Self-Study Examination of Higher Education. (Journal of Tongren University 57a.1,2011),p.22–33.
Lury, D. A. , and R. A. Fisher . Statistical Methods for Research Workers. by R. A. Fisher. (Botanical Gazette 87.3,1929),p.229.
Lin Lin. An Evaluation System and Its Model for Educational Competitiveness of Universities, (International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 2020),p.1
Maoxin Su, Congcong Li, Yiguo Xue, Peng Wang, Kai Cheng, Yimin Liu. Engineering application of fuzzy evaluation based on comprehensive weight in the selection of geophysical prospecting methods, (Earth Science Informatics, 2021)No.3,p21-22.
Saaty T L.Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making: Why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors—The Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process. (Review of the Royal Spanish Academy of Sciences A: Mathematics,2008), p.102
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
