On the Construction of Students' Subjectivity: Connotation, Function and Path

Deng Yong; Shipin Huang

doi:10.6918/IJOSSER.202502_8(2).0011

Authors

Deng Yong
Shipin Huang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202502_8(2).0011

Keywords:

Student subjectivity; Self-directed learning; Teaching reform; Teacher-student relationship.

Abstract

The student agency theory has been proposed for more than 40 years, and it still wanders outside the practice of education and teaching like a ghost. The reason for this is that students' subjectivity has not been constructed, so it is difficult for students to play their main position and role. The essence of the construction of student subjectivity is to cultivate students' subjectivity, determine the main position of students in learning and development, and give full play to students' active role in learning. This has helped the systematic reform of teaching evaluation, from passive learning to active learning, from authoritative teaching to democratic teaching, from knowledge indoctrination to independent construction, from homogeneous development to personalized development, and from being evaluated to mutual evaluation. In practice, it is necessary to promote the construction of students' subjectivity through multi-party collaboration, so that students can become participants in school administrators, active learners with the unity of knowledge and action, and masters of learning and life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Guo Hua. The pedagogical significance of "student subjectivity": commemorating the 30th anniversary of the subjective education experiment [J]. Educational Research,2022, 43(11):56-65.

[2] Rousseau. Emile [M]. Beijing: People's Education Press, 1985:74.

[3] Shi Shuqi, Wang Benlu. The process, problems and solutions of Student-led research in China[J]. Course-textbooks-Teaching ,2022,42 (04):73-79.

[4] Wang Cesan. On the leading role of teachers and the subjective position of students[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University,1983,(06):70-76.

[5] Wang Cesan. Teaching Papers[M].Beijing: People's Education Press,2002:379.

[6] Zhang Dingqiang. Teaching Democracy: Theoretical Implications, Practical Dilemmas and Realization Paths [J]. Educational Science Research, 2020, (07):12-16+22.

[7] John Dewey. School & Society-The School of Tomorrow [M]. Beijing: People's Education Press, 2005: 127.

[8] Cheng Jinwu. The guiding role of teachers and the self-learning of students [J]. People's Education, 1950, (04):16-17.

[9] Zhao Haixia, Guo Jingxuan, eds. Educational Administration[M]. Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Press,2017.06:140-158.

[10] Li Liran. Constructing a student self-management system: solving the problem of large-scale school management[J]. Primary and Secondary School Management, 2020, (10): 44-46.

[11] Song Zhengli, Wang Lei, Cao Yanyan. Mentorship system：Effectively improve the management efficiency of students in ethnic classes in the Mainland[J]. Primary and Secondary School Management, 2022, (03):51-53.

[12] Peng Jingwen, Cao Gen. Practical Tools Beyond Western Parent-Child Communication: The Construction of the "Iron Triangle" Model of Chinese Family Education[J]. Journal of Education of Chinese University of China, 2022, (1):28-38.

[13] Zhang Dongyan, Gao Shuguo. The Functional Evolution and Value Enhancement of Modern Family Education: On the Modernization of Family Education [J]. Chinese Journal of Education, 2020, (01): 66-71.

[14] Malen, B., Ogawa, R. T., & Kranz, J. What do we know about school-based management？A case study of the literature—A call for research[J]. Choice and control in American education,1990 (2):289-342.

[15] Liu Shasha. The changes of the times, the practical dilemma and the choice of approach of family education[J]. Education Academic Monthly, 2023, (01): 44-49.