Research and Effectiveness Analysis of The Evaluation System for University Teachers in The New Era Based on The 'MOLP' Competency Perspective

Luhua Cheng; Hailing Li; Zhiliang Wang; Weiwei Huo

doi:10.6918/IJOSSER.202505_8(5).0042

Authors

Luhua Cheng
Hailing Li
Zhiliang Wang
Weiwei Huo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202505_8(5).0042

Keywords:

Competency model, higher education teachers, model construction, evaluation system for university teachers.

Abstract

Starting from the perspective of management, this study analyzes and summarizes the current research status of competence at home and abroad through literature review. Based on the competence evaluation model of higher education teachers, combined with the development requirements and characteristics of the new era university teacher team, the MOLP competence model for higher education teachers is proposed, and a new era university teacher evaluation system is constructed on the basis of this competence model. The evaluation system for university teachers constructed in this study can provide guidance and suggestions for talent recruitment in domestic universities in the new era, key training areas for young university teachers, performance evaluation indicators for university teachers, and personal development plans for teachers. This study is based on the characteristics of teacher development at S University, and constructs a teacher evaluation system that is suitable for the university. The performance scores of the university's teachers in the past three years were analyzed to verify the leading and promoting role of the evaluation system in enhancing the competence of university teachers and the development of school construction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Mcclelland D C. Testing for competence rather than for 'intelligence'[J]. American Psychologist. 1973, 28(1): 1.

[2] Spencer M L. Nuts in the genetic stew[J]. New Scientist. 1983, 98(1362): 758.

[3] Cristina M B, Stewart L T. Identifying Global Leadership Competencies: An Exploratory Study[J]. Journal of American Academy of Busines. 2004, 5(1): 80-87.

[4] Wang Chongming. Management Psychology [M]. Beijing: People's Education Press. 2001.

[5] Shi Kan, Research Progress on Competency Model Theory and Application [J]. Human Ergonomics. 2002, 8(4): 23-26

[6] Shi Kan, Wang Chengzhi, Li Chaoping. Research on the Evaluation of Competency Model for Senior Managers in Enterprises [J]. Journal of Psychology. 2002(03): 306-311.

[7] Huang Yan. Research on the Competency Evaluation of University Teachers born in the 1980s in China [M]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press. 2013: 268-272

[8] Zhao Zhongjie, Wu Guanlan. Exploration of Training Strategies for College Cadres from the Perspective of Competence [J]. China Economic and Trade Guide. 2021(05): 158-161.

[9] Ministry of Education, Ministry of Finance, National Development and Reform Commission, Notice on Guiding Opinions on Accelerating the Construction of "Double First Class" in Higher Education Institutions [J]. State Council Bulletin of the People's Republic of China. 2019 (01): 68-75.

[10] The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council, Overall Plan for Deepening the Reform of Educational Evaluation in the New Era. People's Daily 2020-10- 14(001).

[11] He Qizong. Research on the Competence of College Teachers in China: Progress and Reflection [J]. Higher Education Research. 2014, 35(10): 38-45.

[12] Niu Duan, Zhang Minqiang. Construction and Verification of Competency Model for College Teachers [J]. Psychological Science. 2012,35(05): 1240-1246.

[13] Luo Shengquan, Meng Xianyun. A Preliminary Study on the Competence of Teaching and Research Personnel [J]. Educational Research. 2017, 38(09): 124-131.

[14] Zhang Baoge. Establish a multi-channel evaluation mechanism for university teachers [N]. Guangming Daily, January 14. 2025 (13).