Research on Korean Foreign Policy since Park Geun-hye Administration from the Perspective of Neoclassical Realism

A Case Study of the THAAD Issue

Authors

  • Bohua Gao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v18i.1137

Keywords:

Korean Foreign Policy, Sino-US Relations, Sino-ROK relations, the THAAD Issue, Neoclassical Realism

Abstract

The pervasiveness of Sino-US relations is profoundly reflected in many regions all over the world. As a wrestling field for various forces, Korean Peninsula has a self-evident strategic value to China and the United States, especially in the terms of military security and geostrategy. Due to the sophisticated environment in Northeast Asia, it is necessary to make an in-depth analysis of South Korea's diplomatic decision-making mechanism based on studying the Sino-US competition system. With the help of neoclassical realism theory, we can pay more attention to the role of domestic factors in state actors. The different attitudes and decisions of Park Geun-hye administration and Moon Jae-in administration towards the THAAD system are inseparable from leaders' intentions, strategic culture, state-society relations, domestic system, and other factors. Their joint efforts under the unique political system restrict and affect the decision-making process and results of Korean diplomacy. Therefore, how these domestic factors show a combined impact on the Korean diplomatic decision-making is the key to the study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Xing, H. M. (2017, July 16). Sino-ROK relations are not an accessory to ROK-US relations. JoongAng Ilbo. (29).

Xie, B. & Wang, X. K. (2017). An analysis of South Korea policy adjustment towards China from the perspective of diplomatic decision-making model based on the study on Park Geun-hye administration. Journal of Liaoning University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 45(04), 149-158.

Kim Ji-yun, Gangworm & Lee, hyoung. (2017, March 19) THAAD deployment on the Korean peninsula and South Koreans' perception of neighboring countries changing rapidly. Issue Brief.

Gu, J. W. & Su, C. H. (2021, June 30). Hedging path, system pressure, and strategy utility of republic of Korea’s hedging strategy in the 21st century. Northeast Asia Forum. 30(06), 106, 121-126.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of People’s Republic of China. (2019, August 28). Wang Yi held talks with ROK’s foreign minister Kang Kyung-ho.

Li, D. Q. (2017, July 26). Moon Jae-in's "Berlin Vision" of North Korea policy and its challenges. China Youth Daily.

Kim, hee-kyo. (2022, April 28). Digging into the “China hatred” of Korean society. Kukmin Ilbo.

Lee, Myung-ah. (2022, January 12). The country that Koreans trust the most is the United States... China, Japan, 1st and 2nd place in the distrustful countries. Unipress.

Wang, S. (2008). American complex of Korean diplomacy and its choice-close to America will not be estranged with China. Northeast Asia Forum. 27-32.

Dong, X. R. (2022). ROK presidential election and foreign policy outlook of Yoon Suk-yeol administration. Contemporary World. (04), 50-55.

Kurata, H. (2019). Korean peace building and Sino-US relations: An "Ad-hoc" concert of interests? Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 8(1), 30-49.

Yangmo, K. (2019). Privatized foreign policy? explaining the Park Geun-hye administration’ s decision-making process. Korea Journal, 59(1), 106-134.

Shin, S. (2020). The rise and fall of Park Geun-hye: The perils of South Korea's weak party system. Pacific Review, 33(1), 153-183.

Hahm, S., & Heo, U. (2020). President Moon Jae-in at midterm: What affects public support for Moon Jae-in? Journal of Asian and African Studies (Leiden), 55(8), 1128-1142.

Azad, S. (2022). Perks and perils of strategic choice: South Korea's Iran policy under Moon Jae-in. East Asia (Piscataway, N.J.), 1-17

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Gao, B. . (2022). Research on Korean Foreign Policy since Park Geun-hye Administration from the Perspective of Neoclassical Realism: A Case Study of the THAAD Issue. BCP Social Sciences & Humanities, 18, 387-399. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v18i.1137