Machiavelli and Mao Zedong, the Comparison Across Centuries

Authors

  • Ziyu Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v18i.1140

Keywords:

Mao Zedong, Machiavelli, realism

Abstract

With similar background conditions of the two great political thinkers, Mao Zedong and Machiavelli shared some similar political wisdom in gaining and ruling the throne. However, as a Communist that innately has a significant number of idealistic beliefs and doctrines within, Mao differed greatly from a purely pragmatic politician. This paper analyzes the similarities and differences in thoughts between Mao Zedong, the founding leader of the People’s Republic of China, and Machiavelli, the famous Italian Renaissance writer who introduced realism and pragmaticism to the European world. Mao’s political career is divided into two primary stages in this essay, which are the pre-proclamation and post-proclamation of the formation of People’s Republic of China. The differences in time eras and political ideologies between Mao and Machiavelli made Mao unable to be qualified entirely as a Machiavellian. Rather, Mao should be considered as a pragmatic Communist leader with realist traits similar to the ones discussed in Machiavelli’s books and thoughts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Skinner, Quentin. Machiavelli: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford, Oxfordshire, 2019.

Machiavelli, Niccolo, et al. The Prince (Penguin Classics). Reissue, Penguin Classics, 2003.

King, Gilbert. "The Silence that Preceded China's Great Leap into Famine". Smithsonian. Retrieved November 28th, 2019.

Rui Huaichuan (June 2nd 2004). Globalisation, Transition and Development in China: The Case of the Coal Industry. Routledge. pp. 104–. ISBN 978-1-134-31804-9.

Liao, Jianqiao, and Jun Zhao. “The Review of Machiavellianism.” East China Economic Management, ser. 4, 2013, pp. 145–148. 4.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Li, Z. . (2022). Machiavelli and Mao Zedong, the Comparison Across Centuries. BCP Social Sciences & Humanities, 18, 416-422. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v18i.1140