Research on the Multiple Exclusion Phenomenon in the Chinese “Core Weeaboo” Group

Authors

  • Zhiming Xia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v18i.1163

Keywords:

weeaboo culture, subculture, exclusion

Abstract

Among the subcultures that have developed rapidly in recent years, weeaboo culture covers a growing number of people. Meanwhile, corresponding differentiation has taken place among the weeaboos, typically including “core weeaboo” group and “pan weeaboo” group. Generally, “core weeaboos” refer to a group of people who are deeply involved in the weeaboo culture. On one hand, in the online community, “core weeaboos” tend to reject normal interaction with “pan weeaboos”, who they think are not deeply involved in the culture; on the other hand, due to the long-term prejudice of the mainstream culture against the weeaboos, the “core weeaboo” group has also suffered from the exclusion from the mainstream culture for a long time, thus forming a unique chain of “multiple exclusion”. With the “core weeaboo” group as the research object, this paper conducts online and field research on the phenomenon of “multiple exclusion” in the relevant groups by means of questionnaire and interview. It is found that the phenomenon of “multiple exclusion” in essence can be considered a two-way interaction between the “core weeaboo” group and the mainstream culture. In order to alleviate this phenomenon, this paper advocates that mainstream culture should increase its understanding of subcultural groups, and actively encourage high-quality “fusion”, so as to reduce the adverse effects on corresponding subcultural groups.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dick Hebdige. Subculture:The Meaning of Style. Routledge, 1979, p. 93.

Ouyang Youquan, Deng Zhen. The Origin, Shaping and Forward Path of Chinese ACGN Culture. Academic Monthly. Vol. 52 (2020) No. 03, p. 132-140.

Kipling D. Williams. Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology. Vol. 58 (2007), p.425-452.

Wendi L. Gardner, Cynthia L. Pickett, Marilynn B. Brewer. Social exclusion and selective memory: How the need to belong influences memory for social events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Vol. 26 (2000) No. 04, p.486-496.

Kipling D. Williams, Anita Smith. RU there? Ostracism by cell phone text messages. Group dynamics: Theory, research, and practice. Vol. 8 (2004) No. 04, p.291.

Sun Xiaojun, Tong Yuantian, Fan Cuiying. Social Exclusion and Cyberostracism on Depression: the Mediating Role of Self-control. Psychological and behavioral research. Vol. 15 (2017) No. 02, p.169-174.

Matthew J. Quade, Rebecca L. Greenbaum, Oleg V. Petrenko. “I don't want to be near you, unless…”: The interactive effect of unethical behavior and performance onto relationship conflict and workplace ostracism. Personnel Psychology. Vol. 70 (2017) No. 03, p.675-709.

Wang Haibo, Yan Ming, Wu Haibo, Li Jinrong, Wang Xiaohui. Hostile retaliation or identity motivation? The mechanisms of how newcomers’ role organizational socialization affects their workplace ostracism. Journal of Psychology. Vol. 51 (2017) No. 01, p.128-140.

He Chuan: The research on campus-otaku (Master degree, Southwest University, China 2014). p.1-46.

Zhang Meilan, Zhong Ying, Self existence: on the anti incorporation of Contemporary Weeaboos. Journal of Hubei University. Vol. 48 (2021) No. 05, p.69-78.

Zhang Yanhui: Dimensionality reduction, Identity and Legalization: The Daily Cultural Practice of the Fans of The Rabbit That Year (Post-graduate degree, Nanjing University, China 2018). P.78-82.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Xia, Z. . (2022). Research on the Multiple Exclusion Phenomenon in the Chinese “Core Weeaboo” Group. BCP Social Sciences & Humanities, 18, 564-570. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v18i.1163