A study on the meta-regulatory model of Internet platforms in the view of algorithmic governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v19i.1741Keywords:
Algorithmic governance, Meta-regulation, Self-regulation, Government regulation, Third party organizationsAbstract
Meta-regulation is a regulation model that retunes the ability of self-regulation, which can take full advantage of the information and resources possessed by the regulated, is more sensitive to the market situation, and can enhance the incentive of the regulated to comply with the rules. Therefore, it is suitable for the regulated that is complex and in a dynamic evolutionary state. The uncertainty of algorithmic risk breaks through the ability of the traditional regulation model, while the meta-regulation model is a reference paradigm. The meta-regulation of platform algorithms has the characteristics of reflexivity, and the procedural regulation required by it can be achieved in three aspects: authentication system, transparency and accountability. Meta-regulation of platform algorithms is not limited to regulating the management of the platform itself and external regulation by the government, but should also empower third-party organizations to play a role in establishing high standards of industry compliance and creating value through meta-regulation by taking advantage of their concentrated technical and professional resources. The relationship between public and private subjects that are interconnected and mutually supportive is the development trend of platform algorithm governance in the future.
Downloads
References
Cheng Ying. Data protection and algorithm regulation under the meta-regulation model - taking the EU General Data Protection Regulation as a research sample[J]. Legal Science (Journal of Northwestern University of Political Science and Law), 2019, 37(04): 48-55.
Hu MJ, Chen M. A meta-regulatory approach to the construction of digital healthcare rule of law[J]. The construction of digital healthcare rule of law based on meta-regulation[J]. Journal of the University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,2022,42(06):66-82+164-165.
Kerwer, D. (2005). 'Rules that Many Use: Standards and Global Regulation', Governance, 18: 611-632.
Lv Peng, Li Mundi, Zhang Zhuo. The double logic of digital socialization[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Social Science Edition),2021,41(02):71-77+87.
Ma Changshan. The governance challenges of smart society and their dissolution[J]. Journal of Seeking Knowledge,2019,46(05):91-98.
Ma Changshan. Legal changes in the era of smart Internet[J]. Legal Studies,2018,40(04):20-38.
[US] Robert Baldwin, Martin Cave, Martin Lodge. The Oxford Handbook of Regulation [M], translated by Song Hualin, Li Plover, An Yongkang, and Lu Chao, Shanghai Sanlian Bookstore Press, 2017.
Xiao Hongjun. Building responsible platform algorithms [J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Social Science Edition),2022,42(01):120-130.
Xu Ke, Liu Chang. On algorithm filing system[J]. Artificial Intelligence,2022(01):64-70.
Yu Siying, Ji Weidong, Cheng Jinhua, Zheng Ge, Hou Liyang. Dialogue: technological innovation, market structure change and legal development[J]. Jiaotong University of Law,2018(03):55-78.
Ye Bifeng. Delegation of affairs and delegation of authority among administrative organs[J]. Chinese Law, 2022(03):39-59.
Zhang Yan, Cheng Mengheng. Research on the bias of artificial intelligence marketing communication algorithm and meta-regulation path[J]. China Publishing,2021(08):27-30.






