Lesbian Identity Construction: An Adhesive Identity Proces
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v21i.3415Keywords:
Lesbian; adhesive identities; multi-role.Abstract
As part of the sexual minority, lesbians receive less attention than gay men. Compared with gay men, lesbians bear more pressure from traditional culture and social discipline, and their identification process is more complicated. In other words, lesbians form a more open "mixed self" in the process of accepting multi-culture and multiple identities. To explore the identity status and mode of lesbians, the qualitative interview was used to conduct in-depth interviews with 5 lesbians. The results show that the main interaction dimensions of lesbians are as follows: In the process of interaction with self, parents, heterosexual community, and homosexual community in the above four dimensions, different situations or different situations in the same situation will change the way individuals manage their identities. Conflicts, coordination, concealment, or integration among different identities will affect the psychological state of individuals: Steadiness or anxiety, or sometimes steadiness and sometimes anxiety, will also lead to the different behavior of the individual. It can be seen that the identity of lesbians, namely the acceptance of their own multi-role identities, is a process of integration with multiple identities and roles. By introducing the concept of adhesive identity, this study enriched the interpretation of the psychological and behavioral manifestations of the lesbian identity process.
Downloads
References
Han H. Meyer. Prejudice, Social Stress, and Mental Health in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Populations: Conceptual Issues and Research Evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5) (2003), 674-697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674.
Cochran, S. D., & Mays, V. M. Depressive distress among homosexually active African American men and women. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151(4) (1994), 524-529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.151.4.524.
Dohrenwend, B. Social status and psychological disorders: An issue of substance and an issue of method. American Sociological Review, 31(1) (1966),14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2091276
Allport, G. W. The nature of prejudice. Reading, 1954.
Shidlo, A. Internalized homophobia: Conceptual and empirical issues in measurement. In Lesbian and gay psychology: Theory, research and clinical applications 1(1994),176–205. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483326757.n10
Postmes, T., & Branscombe, N. R. Influence of long-term racial environmental composition on subjective well-being in African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,83(2003), 735–751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/e633872013-042
Thoits, P. Self-labeling processes in mental illness: The role of emotional deviance. American Journal of Sociology, 91(2) (1985), 221-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/228276
Charles Taylor. Sources of the self: The making of the modem identity. Harvard University Press. 1992.
Cass, V.C. Homosexual identity formation: Testing a theoretical model. Journal of sex research, 20(2) (1984), 143-167. DOI: 10.1080/00224498409551214
Hammack, P. L. The life course development of human sexual orientation: An Integrative paradigm. Human Development,48(5) (2005), 267-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000086872
Yang, H. S., Liao, Q. M., & Huang, X. T. Minorities remember more: the effect of social identity salience on group-referent memory. Memory, 16(8) (2008), 910-917. DOI: 10.1080/09658210802360629