The Host States’ Regulatory Obligation to Human Rights Violations by Transnational Corporations

Authors

  • Jiazhuo Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v21i.3425

Keywords:

Human right; Host country obligations; Multinational corporations.

Abstract

The increasing importance of multinational corporations in the process of economic globalization, but the increasing number of human rights violations in the context of the operations of multinational companies has led to an increasing amount of research and reflection by the international community on such cases. In cases of human rights violations by transnational corporations, the victims are usually people living in the host country, and the violations are committed in the host country, so the host country has the right and the obligation to regulate and manage such cases. The obligation of States to protect human rights, the principle of mutual non-impairment of sovereignty and the necessary international cooperation are the main theoretical foundations of this obligation. According to the concept of due diligence, the state must take preventive measures when it knows or should know the risk of human rights violations and when it has the appropriate means or resources to prevent them. This paper summarizes the current dilemma of the host country concerning the corresponding regulatory obligations and analyses the corresponding causes through the research method of case studies and comparative research. It also summarizes the current views on the relationship between the duty of prevention and legal responsibility in the host country and the solutions to the host country’ s jurisdictional dilemma.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Moeckli, D., Shah, S., Harris, D., Sivakumaran, S. (Eds.), International human rights law, Oxford University Press, 2014.

De Schutter O., International human rights law, Cambridge University Press, 2019.

De Schutter O., Towards a New Treaty on Business and Human Rights, Business and Human Rights Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, 2016, pp. 41-67. DOI: 10.1017/bhj.2015.5

Van Ho, T., General Comment No 24 on State Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the Context of Business Activities(CESCR), International Legal Materials, vol. 58, no. 4, 2017, pp. 872-889. DOI: 10.1017/ilm.2019.33.

Zhu, L. (2019, April 26). The UK Supreme Court: Jurisdiction over Infringements Committed by Foreign Subsidiaries of Parent Companies in International Law & Policy. Retrieved July 28, 2022, from https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/pMmmg2PztwXpBMf3XdfO9g.

Hafner-Burton, E. M., & Ron, J., Seeing Double: Human Rights Impact Through Qualitative and Quantitative Eyes, World Politics, vol.61, no.2, 2009, pp.360-401. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1287858.

Newman, D., Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co, Sustainable Development Law & Policy, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 20.

Stewart, D. P., Wuerth, I., Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.: The Supreme Court and the Alien Tort Statute, American Journal of International Law, vol. 107, no. 3, 2013, pp. 601-621. DOI:10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.3.0601

United States. Congress, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act: Conference Report (to Accompany HR 4173), US Government Printing Office, vol. 111, no. 517, 2010.

Turner, R. J., Transnational Supply Chain Regulation: Extraterritorial Regulation as Corporate Law’s New Frontier, Melbourne Journal of International Law, vol. 17no. 1, 2016, pp. 188-209.

Liang Yu, Home State obligations to regulate transnational corporations in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A review of the recent practice of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Global Law Review, vol. 36, no. 6, 2014, pp. 160-172.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-15

How to Cite

Li, J. (2023). The Host States’ Regulatory Obligation to Human Rights Violations by Transnational Corporations. BCP Social Sciences & Humanities, 21, 68-74. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v21i.3425