A Comprehensive Analysis of the Political Situation in Russia from the Perspectives of Thucydides, Max Weber, and Michel Foucault

Yiwei Xu

doi:10.54691/bcpssh.v21i.3432

Authors

Yiwei Xu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v21i.3432

Keywords:

Russia's Invasion; Liberalism; Disciplinary Power; Authority.

Abstract

With the current situation in Europe regarding Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the political situation of Russia has generated high interest. The research topic of this paper is the political situation of Russia. To understand the current political situation, the historical situation of the Russian Federation must be explored first. Both historical and modern situations were explored from the three key aspects of authority, motive, and surveillance. Max Weber's theory on authority and domination was used to analyze the historical authorities within Russia leading up to the 1905 Revolution as well as in the 1917 Civil war and eventually the USSR. Thucydides' account of the Speech of the Athenians was used to explore the true motive behind Russia's various advancements in Europe. Lastly, surveillance throughout Russia's lengthy history was studied with references to Michel Foucault's theory of disciplinary power. The study found that throughout the history of the Russian Empire, ambition has been the main motivator behind its numerous advancements. Mass and extreme surveillance has also been a persistent trend in the nation as well as during the USSR. This may indicate that the modern political situation in Russia mirrors its past situations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Zenkovsky A. The Emancipation of the Serfs in Retrospect [J]. Russian Review, 1961, 20(4): 280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/126692.

Reichman H. Railwaymen and Revolution Russia, 1905 [M]. University of California Press, 2021.

Fitzpatrick S. The Russian Revolution [M]. Oxford University Press, 2017.

Polyakova A, Meserole C. Exporting digital authoritarianism: The Russian and Chinese models [J]. Policy Brief, Democracy and Disorder Series, 2019: 1-22.

Luxemburg R. The Russian Revolution, and Leninism Or Marxism? [M]. University of Michigan Press, 1961.

Weber M. Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology [M]. University of California Press, 1978.

Dixon R. Russia's Surveillance State Still Doesn't Match China. but Putin Is Racing to Catch up [J]. The Washington Post, WP Company, 2021.

Wade R A. The Russian Revolution, 1917 [M]. Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Foucault M. Discipline and Punish [M]. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, 2012.

John E. ALEXANDER III, TSAR OF RUSSIA 1881-1889 [J]. History Review, 2008.

Lane C. Legitimacy and Power in the Soviet Union through Socialist Ritual [J]. British Journal of Political Science, 1984, 14(2): 207–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400003537.

Habersetzer N. Moscow Silently Expands Surveillance of Citizens [J]. Human Rights Watch, 2021.

Osborn A, Whalen J. Evidence in Georgia Belies Russia's Claims of 'Genocide' [J]. The Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones & Company, 2008.

Pisch A. The Personality Cult of Stalin in Soviet Posters, 1929–1953: Archetypes, Inventions, and Fabrications [J]. 2022.

Lokshina T. Draconian Law Rammed Through Russian Parliament [J]. Human Rights Watch. Pobrane, 2016.

Lonkila M, Shpakovskaya L, Torchinsky P. The occupation of Runet? The tightening state regulation of the Russian-language section of the Internet [J]. Freedom of expression in Russia’s new mediasphere, 2020: 17-38.

Beyer J L. The emergence of a freedom of information movement: Anonymous, WikiLeaks, the Pirate Party, and Iceland [J]. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2014, 19(2): 141-154.

Encyclopædia Britannica, Soviet Union, Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., https://www.britannica.com/place/Soviet-Union.

Weiner A, Aigi Rahi-Tamm. Getting to Know You: The Soviet Surveillance System, 1939–57 [J]. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 2012, 13(1): 5–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/kri.2012.0011.