Gender Bias in Imprisonment Decisions of Intentional Spousal Homicide in China

Authors

  • Xinran Yang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v21i.3486

Keywords:

Gender; Judge, China; Intentional homicide; Spouse.

Abstract

Spousal homicide has become one of China's most common forms of femicide. Therefore, the investigation of systematic gender bias and gender in-group bias in imprisonment decisions is conducted in this study to explore the fairness and impartiality of the Chinese judicial system. Fifty random intentional spousal homicide cases in China are analysed using the context analysis method. The study found a large similarity between the judicial decision made by female and male judges; however, male plaintiffs have a larger chance of receiving sentences of life imprisonment and the death penalty from judges of either gender. Moreover, excluding life imprisonment and the death penalty, plaintiffs of identical gender as the judge are more likely to receive slightly shorter sentences, suggesting a slight in-group gender bias in the judicial decision in China.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, A global study on homicide, 2019.

I. Armstrong, Women and their ‘uncontrollable impulses’: The medicalisation of women's crime and differential gender sentencing, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 1999, DOI: 10.1080/13218719909524949.

H. Lu, B. Liang & S. Liu, Serious Violent Offenses and Sentencing Decisions in China—Are There Any Gender Disparities? Asian Criminology 8, 2013, pp.159–177, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-012-9155-x.

L. Crites, Women Offenders: Myth vs Reality, The Female Offender, Lexington, Mass., 1976 Lexington Books.

X. Cai, P. Li, Y. Lu, H. Song, Gender In-Group Bias: Evidence from the Judicial Decisions, 2021.

E. Rackley, Women, judging and the judiciary: From difference to diversity, 2013.

C. Gilligan, In a different voice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.

E. Martin, B. Pyle, State high courts and divorce: The impact of judicial gender, University of Toledo Law Review, 36, 2004, pp.923-948.

M.J. Larrabee, An ethic of care: Feminist and interdisciplinary perspectives, 1993.

C.A. MacKinnon, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State, Harvard University Press, 1989.

C. L. Boyd, L. Epstein, A.D. Martin, Untangling the causal effects of sex on judging. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 2010, pp.389-411.

S. Wei, M. Xiong, ‘Judges’ Gender and Sentencing in China: An Empirical Inquiry’, Feminist Criminology, 15(2), 2020, pp. 217–250. DOI: 10.1177/1557085119842660.

E.F. Moulds, Chivalry and paternalism: disparities of treatment in the criminal justice system, The Western Political Quarterly, 31(3), 1978, pp.416–430.

K. Daly, Rethinking judicial paternalism: Gender, work-family relationships, and sentencing, Gender and Society, 3,1989, pp.9–36.

K.P. Luke, Are girls really becoming more violent: a critical analysis, Journal of Women and Social Work, 23, 2008, pp.38–50.

J. Freeman, Women in the workplace: Wages, respect, and equal rights, New York: Rosen, 2020.

Leung, Feminism in transition: Chinese culture, ideology and the development of the women’s movement in China, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20, 2003, 359–374.

B. Depew, O. Eren, N.H. Mocan, Judges, Juveniles and In-Group Bias, NBER Working Paper No. w22003, 2016.

Y. Chen, and S.X. Li, Group Identity and Social Preferences, American Economic Review, 99(4), 2009, pp.31–57.

J. Gruhl, C. Spohn, S. Welch, Women as Policymakers: The Case of Trial Judges, American Journal of Political Science, 25(3), 1981, pp.8–22.

M. Schanzenbach, Racial and Sex Disparities in Prison Sentences: The Effect of District-Level Judicial Demographics, Journal of Legal Studies 34, 2005, pp.57–92.

L.A. Rudman, S.A. Goodwin, Gender Differences in Automatic In-Group Bias: Why Do Women Like Women More Than Men Like Men? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(4), 2004, 494–509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.494.

China Judgements Online, https://wenshu.court.gov.cn/website/wenshu/181029CR4M5A62CH/index.html.

China Court Trial Online, tingshen.court.gov.cn, 2022-7-15.

J. Ning, Main Data of the Seventh National Population Census New Release, National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2021.

A.J. Wistrich, and J.J. Rachlinski, Implicit Bias in Judicial Decision Making How It Affects Judgment and What Judges Can Do About It, 2017, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2934295.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-15

How to Cite

Yang, X. (2023). Gender Bias in Imprisonment Decisions of Intentional Spousal Homicide in China. BCP Social Sciences & Humanities, 21, 243-250. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v21i.3486