Applying Punctuated-Equilibrium Theory to Analyze the Evolving Process of Socioeconomic Policies in Post-war Taiwan

Authors

  • Zhengyu Xiao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v21i.3519

Keywords:

Punctuated-Equilibrium; Taiwan; Socioeconomic Policiesp; Policymaking.

Abstract

This research paper investigates the evolving socioeconomic policies in post-war Taiwan. To better conceptualize and comprehend the dynamics of policy fluctuations and stability, this paper adopts the Punctuated-Equilibrium Model (PEM), which is a model to explain the process of policy stability and changes, to illustrate key variables in policymaking and make the historical review of Taiwan development more predigested. This study in a historical approach by applying the PEM to analyze the policy shifts in Taiwan is unprecedented, and extend the original theoretical model more applicable in a system with both authoritarian system, democratic system and a transition from underdeveloped economy to a modernized economy as the case of Taiwan have demonstrated. Both domestic empirical evidence and comparative researches will be applied to embed the theoretical model into the case. And the results showed that Taiwan’s socioeconomic policy development can be categorized into five different stages in accordance with the PEM, namely Equilibrium of Authoritarian Stability from 1950-1958, First Punctuation from 1958-1965, Equilibrium of Active Statism from 1965-1986, Second Punctuation from 1986-2000, and Equilibrium of Democratic Stability since 2000. In the first punctuation, the freeze of US aid, the incapacity of import substitution strategy and the need for further economic development reframed the government’s policy to be more active in advancing socioeconomic development. In the second punctuation, the imbalance between economic and social development, with the failed political agenda which encouraged the rise of Taiwanese nationalism, produced negative feedback to the policy framing. The policy venues consequently shifted from the government to the opposing groups and public arenas, which eventuated the liberalization and democratization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jones B D, Baumgartner F R. From there to here: Punctuated equilibrium to the general punctuation thesis to a theory of government information processing [J]. Policy Studies Journal, 2012, 40 (1): 1 - 20.

Jones B D, Baumgartner F R, Talbert J C. The destruction of issue monopolies in Congress [J]. American Political Science Review, 1993, 87 (3): 657 - 671.

Rawat P, Morris J C. Kingdon's “Streams” Model at Thirty: Still Relevant in the 21st Century? [J]. Politics & Policy, 2016, 44 (4): 608 - 638.

Sebők M, Berki T. Punctuated equilibrium in democracy and autocracy: An analysis of Hungarian budgeting between 1868 and 2013 [J]. European Political Science Review, 2018, 10 (4): 589 - 611.

Chan Kwan Nok, Zhao Shuang. Punctuated Equilibrium and the Information Disadvantage of Authoritarianism: Evidence from the People's Republic of China [J]. Policy Studies Journal, 2016, 44 (2): 134 - 155.

Huang Y L, Chang D F, Liu C W. Higher education in Taiwan: an analysis of trends using the theory of punctuated equilibrium [J]. Journal of Literature and Art Studies, 2018, 8 (1): 169 - 180.

Lin W Y. A Study on the Change of Taiwan's Renewable Energy Policy [J]. 2022.

Cheng T. Democratizing the quasi-Leninist regime in Taiwan [J]. World Politics, 1989, 41 (4): 471 - 499.

Dickson B J. The lessons of defeat: the reorganization of the Kuomintang on Taiwan, 1950–52 [J]. The China Quarterly, 1993, 133: 56 - 84.

Laws & Regulations Database of The Republic of China (Taiwan). The Martial Laws [EB/OL]. 2022.

Jacoby N H. Evaluation of US economic aid to free China, 1951-1965 [M]. Department of State, Agency for International Development, Bureau for the Far East, 1966.

Chang, D. W. US Aid and Economic Progress in Taiwan [J]. Asian Survey, 1965: 152 - 160.

Wu Qiang. Two fierce financial debates in Taiwan in the 1950s [J]. Reunification Forum, 2015 (5): 62 - 65.

Liao K S. Taiwan's modernization in global perspective [M]. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2002.

Wu Jin Tu, Xia Hong Shen. The course of Taiwan's economic development [J]. Xian Dai Qi Ye, 2000, (11): 4 - 55.

Lin J J, Lin W I. The political and economic impact on the development of social group work in Taiwan [J]. Social Work with Groups, 2009, 32 (1-2): 14 - 28.

Cheng T, Haggard S. Regime transformation in Taiwan: Theoretical and comparative perspectives[J]. Political change in Taiwan, 1992: 1 - 29.

Commonwealth Magazine. Tracks for Progress [OL]. 2021.

Lam W F, Chan K N. How Authoritarianism Intensifies Punctuated Equilibrium: The Dynamics of Policy Attention in Hong Kong [J]. Governance, 2015, 28 (4): 549 – 570.

Chan S, Clark C. Economic Development in Taiwan: Escaping the State—Market Dichotomy [J]. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 1994, 12 (2): 127 - 143.

Kong T Y. Labour and neo-liberal globalization in South Korea and Taiwan [J]. Modern Asian Studies, 2005, 39 (1): 155 - 188.

Wang G X, Shih M C. Dismantling the Government: The Reorganization Reform of Taiwan’s Central Government (1987–2008) [J]. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 2011, 3 (3): 52 - 61.

Tung K. Democratization in Divided Nations: Comparing the Impact of National Identity on Democratic Development between Taiwan and South Korea [D]. Stanford University, 2019.

Chao L, Myers R H. The first Chinese democracy: Political development of the Republic of China on Taiwan, 1986-1994 [J]. Asian Survey, 1994, 34 (3): 213 - 230.

Pao H W, Wu H L, Pan W H. The road to liberalization: Policy design and implementation of Taiwan’s privatization [J]. International Economics and Economic Policy, 2008, 5 (3): 323 - 344.

Tsai M C. Dependency, the state and class in the neoliberal transition of Taiwan [J]. Third world quarterly, 2001, 22 (3): 359 - 379.

Chen T J. Taiwan’s Industrial Policy Since 1990[J]. Department of Economics, National Taiwan University, 2014: 9.

Qi D. Divergent popular support for the DPP and the Taiwan independence movement, 2000–2012 [J]. Journal of Contemporary China, 2012, 21 (78): 973 - 991.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-15

How to Cite

Xiao, Z. (2023). Applying Punctuated-Equilibrium Theory to Analyze the Evolving Process of Socioeconomic Policies in Post-war Taiwan. BCP Social Sciences & Humanities, 21, 346-355. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v21i.3519