Exploring the Safe Harbor Principle and the Allocation of Platform Liability in the DMCA

Authors

  • Peixuan Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v21i.3628

Keywords:

DMCA; Safe Harbor Principles; Digital Copyright Infringement.

Abstract

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act's safe harbor clauses, which was established more than 20 years ago, are no longer able to reconcile the current widespread problem of copyright infringement in social media. Therefore, this paper examines the allocation of responsibilities between social media platforms, users and copyright owners in the event of digital copyright infringement in social media, the negative impact of the DMCA provisions on stakeholders in social media and possible solutions to the problem. The main problem with the current DMCA's safe harbor doctrine is that the exemptions provided shift too much responsibility and liability to copyright owners and social media users, fail to provide effective remedies, and place an extremely heavy burden on them to enforce their rights. This has had a negative impact on the development of social media and creative output. For this reason, Congress need to change the DMCA's upregulating to increase the bar for safe harbor designation and impose additional requirements on platforms. In order to more effectively contribute to the growth of the social media business and the preservation of digital copyright pairs in the field of practice, this study primarily adopts a legal doctrinal research technique, comparative research approach, and literary research method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Congressional Research Service. Safe Harbor for Online Service Providers Under Section 512(c) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act [EB/OL]. https://crsreports.congress.gov R43436, 2022/9/16.

Belleville M. IP wars: SOPA, PIPA, and the fight over online piracy[J]. Temp. Int'l & Comp. LJ, 2012, 26: 303.

Koberidze M. The DMCA Rulemaking Mechanism: Fail or Safe[J]. Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts, 2015, 11 (1): 211.

Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix [J]. Business Horizons, 2009, 52 (4): 357 - 365.

Ward A M. The "Viacom v YouTube" Litigation and Section 512 (c) DMCA: When the Safe Harbor Becomes a Permanent Mooring[M]//Google and the Law. TMC Asser Press, 2012: 203 - 238.

Darrow J J, Ferrera G R. Social Networking Web Sites and the DMCA: A Safe-Harbor from Copyright Infringement Liability or the Perfect Storm [J]. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 2007, 6 (1): 1 - 37.

Arafah, B., & Hasyim, M. social media as a Gateway to Information: Digital Literacy on Current Issues in social media[J/OL]. Webology, 2022, 19 (1): 2491 - 2503.

Bosher H. Key issues around copyright and social media: ownership, infringement and liability[J]. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2020, 15 (2): 123 - 133.

Shapiro, Bernstein and Co. v. H.L. Green Co., 316 F.2d 304 (2d Cir. 1963).

Lee E. Decoding the DMCA safe harbors[J]. Colum. JL & Arts, 2008, 32: 233.

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act [A]. 1998.

Lenz v. Universal Music Corp., 801 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 2015).

Leary, B. Safe Harbor Startups: Liability Rulemaking Under the DMCA [J]. New York University Law Review, 2012, 87 (4): 1135 - 1171.

Johnson D. Capitol Records v. Vimeo: How the Digital Millennium Copyright Act Is Outdated and in Need of Revision [J]. Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, 2017, 38: 155.

Matteson, J. Unfair Misuse: How Section 512 of the DMCA Allows Abuse of the Copyright Fair Use Doctrine and How to Fix It [J]. Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal, 2018, 35 (2): 1 - 22.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-15

How to Cite

Wang, P. (2023). Exploring the Safe Harbor Principle and the Allocation of Platform Liability in the DMCA. BCP Social Sciences & Humanities, 21, 450-456. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v21i.3628