Legal Analysis and Imputation Path Research on Behavior of Infringing Game Virtual Property
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v21i.3629Keywords:
Game Virtual Property; Jurisprudence Analysis; Guilty Path.Abstract
With the rapid development of game industry brought by the change of Internet technology, there are more and more violations on game virtual property. Although there has been a consensus on the attributes of game virtual property, how to criminalize related behaviors still lacks relative basic theory and has certain difficulties. The transfer of possession in the crime of theft and the cognitive error in the crime of fraud has different performances in the specific crime of infringing game virtual property. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the nature of behaviors from the perspective of dogmatics. On the basis of theoretical analysis, it helps to clear the imputation paths of theft, fraud and the crime of illegally obtaining computer information systems from different behavioral perspectives, and determines the amount of crime and the level of sentencing.
Downloads
References
Yang Lixin, Wang Zhonghe. On the Real Right Attribute of Virtual Property in Online Games and Its Basic Rules [J]. Journal of the National Procurator College, 2004, 5 - 6.
Lin Xuxia. Research on Virtual Property Rights [M]. Beijing: Law Press, 2010, 26 - 28.
Du aiping, Ying Jianwei. Reflections on online game property issues [J]. The Rule of Law and Society, 2010, 3: 56 - 58.
Fang wenxi. The legal nature of virtual property in online games and the protection of criminal law [J]. The Rule of Law and Society, 2020,23: 46 - 47.
Zheng zeshan. Criminal law protection of network virtual property [J]. Journal of Gansu Academy of Political Science and law - Nankai University of Law, 2012, 124 (9): 89 - 98.
Chen zeyong. On the legal Nature of Virtual Property Rights [J]. Multidimensional viewpoint - Southwest University of Political Science and Law, 2010, 6: 77 - 81.
Gulou District People’s procuratorate of Fuzhou City, Fujian Province. Lin qingjin, Fuzhou City Intermediate People’s Court of Fujian Province Case No.400 (2018), July 20, 2018.
Ji Jing. Legal construction of the new internet property interests from the perspective of the internet right[J]. Science of Law - Northwest University of Political & Law, 2016, 34 (03): 182 - 191.
Xu Lingbo. Dogmatic Analyze on the Crime against Virtual Property [J]. The Jurist, 2017, 4: 44 - 57.
Tian Hongjie, Xiao Peng, Zhou Shiyu. The Definition and Criminal Protection of Network Virtual Property [J]. People’s Procuratorial Semimonthly, 2015, 5: 56.
Zhang Mingkai. The nature of the behavior of using the found credit card to withdraw money from the ATM machine——Discuss with Professor Liu Mingxiang [J]. Tsinghua Law Review, 2008,1: 91-108.
Zhang Mingkai. On Fraudulent Acts of Crime of Fraud[J]. Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute, 2005, 3: 1 - 13.
Liu Mingxiang. Qualitative research on the behavior of stealing network virtual property [J]. Law Science, 2016,1: 151 - 160.
Cao Junzhe. Research on the determination of the amount of virtual property crimes [D] Shanghai: Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, 2013.
Cheng Xingliang. Criminal Law Attribute and Protection Path of Virtual Property [J] China Legal Science 2017: 2 - 13.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
