Controversy on EPA’s regulation on carbon emissions from electric generation

Authors

  • Jiaxun Cui

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v21i.3809

Keywords:

Carbon emissions, Clean Air Act, Environmental law, EPA

Abstract

In 2021, the case of West Virginia and other state governments against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) brought the Clean Air Act's carbon emissions regulations back into the public eye. The Supreme Court's decision in this lawsuit will have far-reaching implications for the Clean Air Act and the EPA, so the outcome of the lawsuit is being awaited. Therefore, this study focuses on the background of the lawsuit, a description of the law involved, and an assessment and prediction of the overall case. Moreover, it introduces the two different regulating plans regarding the interpretation of §7411(d) of the CAA, and proposes two solutions and discusses their feasibility. One suggestion is to increase EPA's authority over carbon emissions control. Another proposal is to limit EPA's control of carbon emissions to the fenceline. Since then, this paper has expressed a more favorable view of limiting EPA's rights based on analysis and trade-offs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

These are the countries that have made climate commitments law. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/11/new-zealand-net-zero-2050/

Yang, D., & Goulder, L. How Far Can China’s New Carbon Market Cut Its emissions? World Economic Forum, 2021,https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/11/new-carbon-market-slash-chinas-emissions/

Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants | Clean Power Plan | US EPA. Web.archive.org, 2016, https://web.archive.org/web/20160325042337/https://www.epa.gov/cleanpowerplan/clean-power-plan-existing-power-plants

Plumer, B. The Supreme Court just halted the most crucial part of Obama’s climate plan. Vox, 2016, https://www.vox.com/2016/2/9/10955470/supreme-court-blocks-obama-co2-rule

Affordable Clean Energy Rule (ACE). Obama’s climate plan. Vox, 2019, https://www.vox.com/2016/2/9/10955470/supreme-court-blocks-obama-co2-ruleshttps://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2019-07/documents/ace_overview_presentation_j uly2019.pdf

Newton, C. West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency. LII /Legal Information Institute, 2022, https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/20-1530

Irfan, U. EPA analysis of its new climate proposal: thousands of people will die. Vox, 2018, https://www.vox.com/2018/8/21/17763916/epa-clean-power-plan-affordable-clean-energ y

NASA. Global climate change: Effects. Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet; NASA, 2022, https://climate.nasa.gov/effects/

Staff, R. R. N. Supreme Court preview: West Virginia v.EPA. Harvard Law Today, 2022, https://today.law.harvard.edu/scotus-preview-west-virginia-v-epa/

King, N. H. F., Pamela. What the Supreme Court’s move means for EPA climate rules. E&E News, 2021, https://www.eenews.net/articles/what-the-supreme-courts-move-means-for-epa-climate-r ules/

Federal court scraps Trump administration’s power plant rule. Washington Post, 2021, https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2021/01/19/federal-circuit-court-s craps-trump-administration-power-plant-rules/

US EPA. Summary of the Clean Air Act | US EPA. US EPA, 2018, https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-clean-air-act

USC.Title 42. THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE, 2013, Www.govinfo.gov.https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2013-title42/html/USCODE-2013-title42-chap85-subchapI-partA-sec7411.htm

US EPA, O. Electric Utility Generating Units: Repealing the Clean Power Plan, 2017, Www.epa.gov.https://www.epa.gov/stationary-sources-air-pollution/electric-utility-generating-units-repe aling-clean-power-plan#rule-summary

Supreme Court Of The United States Syllabus Massachusetts Et Al. V.Environmental Pro - Tection Agency Et Al. Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The District Of Columbia Circuit, 2006, https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/06pdf/05-1120.pdf

govinfo. Www.govinfo.gov. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2010-title42/USCODE-2010-title42-chap85-subchapIII-sec7602

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 2014, https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-46_bqmc.pdf

Michigan v. Environmental Protection Agency [Review of Michigan v.Environmental Protection Agency], 2014, Oyez. https://www.oyez.org/cases/2014/14-46

MICHIGAN v. EPA. LII / Legal Information Institute. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/14-46#:~:text=EPA

Downloads

Published

2023-02-15

How to Cite

Cui, J. (2023). Controversy on EPA’s regulation on carbon emissions from electric generation. BCP Social Sciences & Humanities, 21, 739-744. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v21i.3809