The pragmatic strategies of apology in WeChat communication
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v17i.631Keywords:
private apology, discourse strategy, social media, WeChatAbstract
A personal private apology is an interpersonal social act in which the apologizer makes an explanation for the offense and repairs the relationship between the two parties on the social media—WeChat. It also involves the harmonious relationship management of the apologizing subject. This paper uses 65 private WeChat chats as a corpus to explore the discourse strategies in private apologies. It is found that personal private apology strategies include expressing apology, explaining reason, self-blaming, and caring for the offended, and less often used strategies such as offering repair, promising to avoid, showing measures done and expressing will. The distribution of strategies indicates that personal private apology is mainly aimed to maintain one’s positive image and reduce self-blame and secondly to repair the face and dignity of the hearer in order to finally dissolve the offending crisis event and repair the friendly interpersonal relationship between both parties. Individuals have the discursive sense to repair the harmonious relationship between the offender and the offended.
Downloads
References
Berry, A. 2018. A one-hundred forty character discourse: The Twittter apology as an emerging sub-genre of corporate communication [J]. Technical Communication, 65(1): 9 - 30
Blum-kulka, S. & E. Olshtain. 1984. Requests and apologies: A cros-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP) [J]. Applied Linguistics, 5(3): 196 - 213
Cohen, A. D. & E. Olshtain. 1981. Developing a measure of sociocultural competence: The case of apology [J]. Language Learning, 31(1): 113 - 134
Coombs, W. T. & S. J. Holaday. 2008. Comparing apology to equivalent crisis response strategies: Clarifying apology’s role and value in crisis communication [J].Public Relations Review, 34: 252 - 257.
Glinert, L. 2010. Apologizing to China: Elastic apologies and the meta-discourse of American diplomats [J]. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(1): 47 - 74.
Goffman, E. 1971. Relations in Public [M]. New York: Harper and Row.
Hargie, O., K. Stapleton & D. Tourist.2010. Interpretations of CEO public apologies for the banking crisis: Attributions of blame and avoidance of responsibility [J]. Organization, 17(6): 721-742
Harris, S., K. Granger & L Mullany. 2006. The pragmatics of political apologies [J]. Discourse & Society, 17(6): 715 - 737
Heritage, J., C. W. Raymond & P. Drew. 2019. Constructing apologies: Reflexive relationships between apologies and offenses [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 142: 185 - 200
Holmes, J. 1989. Sex differences and apologies: One aspect of communicative competence [J]. Applied Linguistics, 10(2): 194 - 213
Holmes, J. 1990. Apologies in New Zealand English [J]. Language in Society, 19(2): 155 - 199
Hu Jiabei & Yang Na. Pragmatic Strategies of Corporate Public Apologies in the Busines Context [J]. Studies of Foreign Languages, 2020(00): 49 – 65
Kádár, D. Z., Haugh, M. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2013.
Kádár, D. Z., P. Y. Ning & Y. P. Ran. 2018. Public ritual apology-A case study of Chinese [J].Discourse, Context & Media, 26: 21-31.
Kador, J. 2009. Effective Apology: Mending Fences, Building Bridges, and Restoring Trust [M]. Oakland: Beret-Koehler Publishers.
Kampf, Z. 2009. Public (non-)apologies: The discourse of minimizing responsibility [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 41: 2257 - 2270.
Kimoga, J. 2010. Remorseles apology: Analysing a political leter [J]. Journal of
Pragmatics, 42:2181 - 2188.
Kim, P. H. Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology vs. denial for repairing ability- vs. integrity-based trust violations[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004, 89(1): 104-118.
Koehn, D. 2013. Why saying “I’m sorry”isn’t good enough: The ethics of corporate apologies [J]. Busines Ethics Quarterly, 23(2): 239 - 268.
Kwabena Sarfo Sarfo-Kantankah. I withdraw and apologise but...: Ghanaian parliamentary apologies, the issue of sincerity and acceptance. [J] Journal of Pragmatics, 2021, 180: 1 - 14.
Lakof, R. T. 1989. The limits of politenes therapeutic and courtroom discourse [J]. Multilingua, 8(2/3): 101 - 129.
Lee, S. & S. Chung. 2012. Corporate apology and crisis communication: The efect of responsibility admitance and sympathetic expresion on public’s anger relief [J]. Public Relations Review, 38: 932 - 934.
Liu Fengguang & Deng Yancheng & Zhao Yingru. A Comparative Study of the Speech Acts of Chinese and American Political Apologists [J]. Foreign Language and Their Teaching. 2016(06): 42 - 55, 148.
Ogiermann，E. 2009. On Apologising in Negative and Positive Politenes Cultures [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Pace, K. M., T. A. Fediuk & I. C. Botero. 2010. The aceptance of responsibility and expresions of regret in organizational apologies after a transgresion [J]. Corporate
Communications: An International Journal, 15(4): 410 - 427.
Page, R. 2014. Saying ’sorry’: Corporate apologies posted on Twiter [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 62: 30 - 45.
Qi Fuding & Xiao Tingting & Kádár. Is it a statement or an apology? - A Study of Public Apologies in Japanese [J]. Foreign Language and Their Teaching, (3): 56-66, 145.
Ran Yongping &Yang Na. Analysis of the Discursive and Pragmatic Nature of Media Messages in Crisis Contexts [J]. Foreign Language and Their Teaching, (6): 12 - 21, 147.
Ursula Lutzky & Andrew Kehoe. 2017. “Oops, I didn’t mean to be so flippant“. A corpus pragmatic analysis of apologies in blog data. [J]Journal of Pragmatics 116: 27 – 36.
Zhang, Y. & C. Vásquezn. 2014. Hotels’ responses to online reviews: Managing consumer dis satisfaction [J]. Discourse, Context and Media, 6:54 - 64.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
