Exploring the System of Punitive Damages for Trademark Malicious Prosecution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v17i.640Keywords:
Trademark Malicious Prosecution, Abuse of Power, Punitive Compensation Mechanism, Legal RegulationAbstract
The phenomenon of trademark malicious prosecution is common, endangering individual private rights and public interests, and the existing legal system is difficult to effectively regulate and remedy the rights of the defendant. In response to this dilemma, it is necessary to establish a punitive damages system to regulate the nature of trademark malicious prosecution based on the "abuse of rights". It is necessary to clarify the criteria of "malicious prosecution" and "seriousness of the circumstances", as well as to formulate the scope of compensation in line with the "optimal deterrence" and balance of interests, to protect the interests of the relevant rights holders, maintain market order and judicial authority.
Downloads
References
Liu Yingshang. Research on the regulation of malicious prosecution -centering on tort liability law [J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2020,52(01):97-106
Wang Jian, Zhang Jing. Deterrence theory and the improvement of China's anti-monopoly fine system -the research progress of law and economics [J]. Legal Science (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law),2016,34(04):124-136
Feng Xiaoqing. The Value Construction of Intellectual Property Law: A Study on the Mechanism of Balancing the Interests of Intellectual Property Law[J]. Chinese Jurisprudence,2007(01):68
Zhu Guangxin. The evolution and application of punitive compensation system[J]. China Social Science,2014(03):116
Zhu Jinmei. Research on the mechanism of punitive damages for malicious prosecution [D]. Fuzhou University,2017:13
Zhang Xinbao. Research on the elements of tort liability [M], Beijing: Law Press. 2007:11
Wang Liming. On the rules of punitive damages for infringement of intellectual property rights in China's civil code [J]. Politics and Law,2019(08):97






