Analysis of Proximization in Russia Public Discourse
A Case Study of President Putin’s speech on the Russia-Ukrainian conflict
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v17i.642Keywords:
Proximization Theory, Russia, Ukraine, Political discourse, legitimacyAbstract
Based on President Putin’s over 10,000—words speech on the Russia-Ukraine conflict which was delivered on February 21, 2022, this study analyzes the construction of legitimacy in Russia public discourse from the perspective of Proximization Theory. The results of the present study are as follows. First, Putin used spatial proximization to identify the elements of the deictic of the DS(IDCs) and the elements outside the deictic center of the DS(ODCs) to highlight the process and influence of proximization of ODCs to IDCs in order to create fear among the audience and to prove the legalization of military operations. Second, in terms of temporal proximization, he used lots of the past simple tenses and present perfect tenses to generate contrasting discourse so as to construct threats from past events to the future, as well as the use of modal verb phrases to build the continuous influence of ODCs on the present and the future to reflect the urgency of the current situation. Finally, in light of axiological proximization, it underlined Russia's positive values in response to external threats. contrasting with the antitheses’ negative values. The defense of national interests and the necessity of the waging war were emphasized. The present study provides insights into the application of Proximization Theory in Russian-Ukrainian discourse, as well as the characteristics of Russian political language styles.
Downloads
References
Halliday, (2000). M. A. K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.
Wodak, R. (2001). The Discourse-historical approach. [A]. In R.Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
Cap, P. (2006). Legitimization in Political Discourse: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective on the Mordern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Cap, P. (2013). Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ji Molin. A study of discursive strategies of public health discourse from the proximization perspective. (Master, Shandong University, China 2021). p. 25-30.
Song Gairong, Liu Yiwei. An proximization study of critical discourse analysis——on the 2017 National Security of the United States of America. Journal of North China University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition). Vol.19(2019). No.1, p.112-119
Sun Sucha. A study of Construction of English Classroom Discourse System fromthe proximization perspective. Journal of Lvliang Education Institute. Vol. 35 (2018) No. 4, p. 96-100.
Zhang Yanmin, Zhang hui. Critical cognitive Linguistics analysis of discourse in Public health Emergencies -- a case study of Chinese and Foreign media coverage of "Vaccine Event" in 2018. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages. Vol.43(2020). No.6, p.73-81.
Yan bing. Contrastive analysis of Anti-corruption discourses in Chinese and western media: A critical cognitive study. (Master, Nanjing Normal University, China 2019). p. 35-49.
Cao Jianmin. A translation research on Chinese-English discourse of A Community with a Shared Future for Mankind from the Perspective of Proximization theory.(Master, North University of China, China 2021). p. 31-32.






