Research on the impact of environmental regulation and government support on green technology innovation

Yongsheng Yu; Lu Zhang

doi:10.54691/bcpssh.v17i.661

Authors

Yongsheng Yu
Lu Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v17i.661

Keywords:

environmental regulation, government support, green technology innovation, spatial error model, threshold model

Abstract

Green technology innovation is an important guarantee for my country to achieve high-quality development in the new era. Taking the 2010-2018 Chinese provincial panel data as a sample, the spatial error model and the panel threshold model are used to study the impact of environmental regulation and government support on green technology innovation. The results show that: the green technology innovation in each province has certain spatial agglomeration characteristics, there is a knowledge spillover effect, the environmental regulation area has a positive impact on green technology innovation, and the government support has no significant impact; environmental regulation and government support have a threshold effect on green technology innovation. , the impact of the two on green technology innovation has a marginal diminishing effect; compared with environmental regulation, government R&D support can promote internal green technology innovation activities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

He Xiaogang. Research on the optimal regulatory structure of green technology innovation——Based on the dual interaction effect of R&D support and environmental regulation［J］． Economic Management, 2014(11): 144-153.

Wang Linhui, Wang Hui, Dong Zhiqing. Compatibility policy conditions of economic growth and environmental quality—a test of policy bias effect from the perspective of environmental technology progress [J]. Management World, 2020(3): 39-60.

Mamuneas T P, Nadiri M I. Public R&D policies and cost behavior of the US manufacturing industries [J]. Journal of Public Economics, 1996(1): 57-81.

Kriechel B, Ziesemer T. The environmental Porter hypothesis: Theory, evidence, and amodel of timing of adoption [J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2009(3): 267-294.

Petroni G, Bigliardi B, Galati F. Rethinking the porter hypothesis: The under appreciated importance of value appropriation and pollution intensity [J]. Review of Policy Research, 2019(1): 121-140.

LANOIEP, PATRYM, LAJEUNESSER. Environmental regulation and productivity: testing the Porter Hypothesis［J］． Journal of productivity analysis, 2008, 30(2): 121-128.

Liu Wei, Tong Jian, Xue Jing. Industry heterogeneity, environmental regulation and industrial technology innovation [J]. Scientific Research Management, 2017(5): 1-11.

Tao Changqi, Ju Zexia. An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Financial Development, Environmental Regulation and Technological Innovation—Based on Panel Threshold Regression Model [J]. Journal of Jiangxi Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2015(1): 27-33.

Chen Yongtai, Xu Hanyu, Xu Feng. Design of government R&D subsidy contract for green innovation of enterprises [J]. Journal of System Management, 2019(4): 717-724.

Xie Weimin, Tang Qingquan, Lu Shanshan. Government R&D Funding, Enterprise R&D Expenditure and Independent Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies [J]. Financial Research, 2009 (6): 86-99.

Liu Jinru, Zeng Xianfeng, Zeng Qian. The impact of environmental regulation and government innovation subsidies on enterprise green product innovation [J]. Economics and Management Research, 2019(6): 106-118.

Li Yuanyuan, Li Guihua, Shao Wei, etc. The influence of government subsidy and environmental regulation on technological innovation investment［J］． Scientific Research, 2019(9): 1694-1701.

Wang Feihang, Guo Xiaoyan. Research on the optimal regulation interval of green technology innovation: Based on the dual policy combination of environmental regulation and government R&D subsidies [J]. Finance and Accounting Monthly, 2021(17):129-137.

HANSEN B E. Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation, testing, and inference［J］. Journal of econometrics, 1999, 93(2): 345-368.

LACH S. Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel［J］． The journal of industrial economics, 2002, 50(4): 369-390.

LEE E Y, CIN B C. The effect of risk-sharing government subsidy on corporate R&D investment: empirical evidence from Korea［J］． Technological forecasting and social change, 2010, 77(6): 881-890.