Research on the Path of Identifying the Online Live-Streaming Marketing Behaviors within the Framework of the Anti-Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China

Authors

  • Tianya Peng

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v17i.680

Keywords:

online live-streaming marketing, the Anti-Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China, relevant market definition, hub-and-spoke conspiracy, cooperative behavior

Abstract

Although online live-streaming marketing shows nowadays play an important role in stimulating consumption and activating economic circulation, problems also arise and become more prominent, especially reflected from the marketing participants who are suspected of monopoly damage to the order of market competition. However, due to the absence of applicable antitrust norms for online live-streaming marketing, the legislation by far is insufficient for the determination of the subject in the process of the Anti-Monopoly Law. Worse still, there are legislative defects in constituting monopoly agreements and complex factors affecting the dominant market position. In recent years, foreign countries have attached great importance to the Internet antitrust issue and taken a number of powerful measures, such as the implementation of the hub-and-spoke conspiracy for identifying Internet platform and the clarification of the platform monopoly "synergistic behavior" judgment standards, etc., which is worthy of reference. China, in this sense, should adopt the antitrust law rules for the determination of the unincorporated form of the subjects in online live-streaming marketing, improve the identification path of online live-streaming marketing constituting the hub-and-spoke Conspiracy and collaborative behavior, update the determination criteria of the market dominance in the online live-streaming marketing and enrich the antitrust law determination procedure. All these methods will help to optimize the antitrust law identification path of the online live-streaming marketing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jiang, Q., & Di, H.M. (2022). Research on Anti-Competitive Effect and Anti-Monopoly Path of Data-Driven Platform M&A. Research of Finance and Education, 35(2), 3-13.

Lai, S.X., & Zhong, M.C. (2022). A Probe in the Definition of Data-related Markets. Price Supervision and Anti-Monopoly in China (2), 17-21.

Li, W.Y. (2022). New Ideas for Defining Platform Related Markets in the Digital Economy. Market Weekly, 35(2), 168-170.

Yi, F., & Bao, J.H. (2022). A Quantitative Study on Related Market Definition of Platform Enterprises under the Background of Digital Economy: Taking Alibaba’s 'Exclusive Dueling' Case as an Example. Research On Financial and Economic Issues (2), 33-41.

Yu, H. & Liu, T.T. (2021). Status Quo of the E-Commerce Platforms in China. China National Conditions and Strength (6),33-40.

Zhao, Z.J. (2021). Legal Regulation of Abusing Market Dominant Position in Internet Platform. Journal of Taiyuan City Vocational College (11), 193-196.

Zou, K.L., & Wang. X. (2021). The Identification Obstacles and Path Optimization of Dominant Position of the Market of Internet Platform. Price: Theory & Practice (4), 26-32.

Chen, B., & Ma, X.R. (2021). Approaches to Better Determination of Platform Enterprise Monopoly in Digital Economy. Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Editions), 38(3), 1-19.

Jiang, S. (2021). Discussion on the Anti-Monopoly Regulation of Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracy. Social Science Research (4), 43-54.

Wang, H. (2020). Research on Anti-trust Regulation to Dominant Market Position Abuse of Internet Platform Enterprises. Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law (06), 77-83.

Ding, C.Y. (2015). On the Refinement of the Determination Method of "Relevant Market" in the Application of China's Antitrust Law: The Limitations of the SSNIP in Defining the Internet-Related Market. Political Science and Law (03), 89-99.

Hovenkamp, H., (2021). Antitrust and Platform Monopoly. Yale Law Journal (8), 1952-2051.

Hovenkamp, E., (2019). Platform Antitrust. Journal of Corporation Law (4),713-754.

Bamberger, Kenneth A, (2017). Platform Market Power. Berkeley Technology Law Journal (3), 1051-1092.

Jonathan B Baker, (2021). Protecting and Fostering Online Platform Competition: The Role of Antitrust Law. Journal of Competition Law & Economics (2), 493-501.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-10

How to Cite

Peng, T. (2022). Research on the Path of Identifying the Online Live-Streaming Marketing Behaviors within the Framework of the Anti-Monopoly Law of the People’s Republic of China. BCP Social Sciences & Humanities, 17, 385-396. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v17i.680