On the Criteria for Identifying Unfairly High Prices for Standard-essential Patent Licensing

Authors

  • Yinjiya Sai

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v17i.687

Keywords:

Standard-essential patents, unfairly high prices, patent license fees

Abstract

It is of practical significance for China that the Anti-monopoly Law of the People’s Republic of China intervenes in the definition of standard-essential patents and the setting of criteria for determining unfairly high prices for patent licensing in order to eliminate the adverse effects of specific license fee collection behaviors on competition. The practical situation of the determination of unfairly high price of standard-essential patent licenses in China reflects many problems of the current determination standards, such as the unclear definition of unfairly high price, the deficiency of comparative prerequisites in the comparable transaction method, and the untenable reasoning in the qualitative analysis method. Therefore, the criteria for determining unfairly high prices of standard-essential patent licenses should be improved. The focus should be on quantifying the price in order to analyze its reasonableness for reference of determining the unfairness of the high price. In the determination, the conduct of the patentee and its effects should be evaluated at the same time in order to ensure the comprehensive and objective results of the determination. In order to deal with the variability of unfairly high prices of standard-essential patent licenses, should give discretionary power to law enforcement officers and improve antitrust enforcement in the field of standard-essential patents.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wang, X.Y. 2015. On the Antitrust Lawsuits concerning Standard Essential Patents, China Legal Science (6), 22.

Han, W. and Yin, F.L. 2014. Market Status Determination of Standard Essential Patent Holders. Electronic Intellectual Property (3).

Su, H. 2014. The Core Issues of Unfair Pricing Antitrust Regulation - The Qualcomm Case as a Perspective. Price Supervision and Anti-monopoly in China (8).

Jiao, H. and Dai, X. 2016. The determination of unfair license fees for standard-essential patents. Competition Policy Research (1).

Dong X. 2019. The Balance of Interests in Regulating the Use of Standard-essential Patents under Antitrust Law - Also Commenting on the . Academic Forum (4).

Liu Z.C. 2021. On the Antitrust Law Regulation of Unfair High Price Licensing of Standard Essential Patents. Journal of Heilongjiang Vocational Institute of Ecological Engineering (1).

Li J. 2017. Standard-essential Patent License Fee Confirmation and Ex Post Facto Ming Bias Reflections on Huawei v. IDC. Peking University Law Journal (1).

Yang, Y.C. and Yang S.Q. 2016. On the Improvement of the Method of Identifying Unfairly High Prices Related to Patents - Taking the Qualcomm Case and Huawei v. Interactive Digital Case as Perspectives. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (4).

Ma, H.S.2016. The Confusion of Judicial Pricing of Standard Essential Patent License Fees. Intellectual Property (12).

Shi, S.H. 2014. Standard-essential patent litigation triggered by thinking about FRAND principle and injunction. Electronic Intellectual Property (1).

Zhao, Q.S. 2017. Study on the Judicial Determination of Reasonable License Fees for Standard Essential Patents. Intellectual Property (7).

Yi, J.M. and Hu X.W. 2021. Competition Policy in the Implementation of Standard-essential Patents - Judicial Measurement of Patent Hijacking and Reverse Hijacking. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) (2).

Mei, X.Y. and Ren L. 2017. On the Legal Application of the Unfairly High Price Regime under the Antimonopoly Law. Hebei Law Science (7).

Ding, M.Z. 2016. On the Antitrust Regulation of Patent High Price Licensing. Intellectual Property (3).

Wei, D. 2020. Reflection on Antitrust Law Regulating Abuse of Standard-essential Patent Rights. Northern Legal Science (3).

Zhang, P. & Ma, X. 2005. Standardization and Intellectual Property Strategy. Intellectual Property Press.

Wang, X.L. 2001. Intellectual Property and Antitrust Law - A Study on Antitrust Issues of Intellectual Property Abuse. Law Press·China.

Zhang, S.W. 2018. Economic Law (2nd ed.), Higher Education Press.

Ma, H.S. 2010. Principles of Patent Licensing - A Study on Fair. Reasonable and Non-discriminatory Licensing. Law Press·China.

Tang, L.F. 2018. Confirm the Unfair High Price of Standard Essential Patents. Master Dissertation, Xiamen Univeristy.

Zhou, S.Y. 2019. Research on the Definition of Excessive Pricing. Xiamen University.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-10

How to Cite

Sai, Y. (2022). On the Criteria for Identifying Unfairly High Prices for Standard-essential Patent Licensing. BCP Social Sciences & Humanities, 17, 445-453. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v17i.687